Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
	Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
	Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>, Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Youngjun Park <youngjun.park@lge.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>,
	Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: fail the fault on a malformed swap entry instead of retrying it
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 13:03:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7238caa-cc47-4811-a395-4784350ba599@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anxRBd_LJaHmtzDS@pedro-suse>

On 8/12/26 12:59, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 09:26:51AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
>> do_swap_page() returns 0 when get_swap_device() fails, which the fault
>> handler reads as "handled". For an entry that can never become valid
>> the retry takes the same fault again, so the thread spins until it is
>> killed.
>>
>> Return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS for a malformed entry, as the sibling arm
>> already does for an unrecognised non-swap entry. A NULL return still
>> means swapoff, which is still worth retrying.
> 
> What kind of SIGBUS do you get from this? as in the si_code. Out of all
> the options
> 
> #define BUS_ADRALN	1	/* invalid address alignment */
> #define BUS_ADRERR	2	/* non-existent physical address */
> #define BUS_OBJERR	3	/* object specific hardware error */
> /* hardware memory error consumed on a machine check: action required */
> #define BUS_MCEERR_AR	4
> /* hardware memory error detected in process but not consumed: action optional*/
> #define BUS_MCEERR_AO	5
> 
> I would say this would fit none of them. The default (AFAICT) would be
> BUS_ADRERR, and I think that one is quite overloaded with meaning (namely,
> with regards to memory-mapped IO past EOF, or EIO on file IO). I wouldn't
> love to also use it for this, IMO.

Note that what is discussed here that should usually happen unless kernel bug.
So I don't think we have to worry about the details here, really.

It's similar to the VM_FAULT_SIGBUS handling earlier in the function after the
print_bad_pte().

-- 
Cheers,

David


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10 16:26 [PATCH 0/3] mm, swap: don't spin or flood the console on a bad swap entry Breno Leitao
2026-08-10 16:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm, swap: ratelimit bad swap entry reports in get_swap_device() Breno Leitao
2026-08-11 15:33   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-11 16:48     ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-12 10:37       ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-12 10:58       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-10 16:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, swap: distinguish a malformed swap entry from a dying device Breno Leitao
2026-08-11 15:36   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-12 10:48     ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-12 11:00       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-12 11:02       ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-12 11:06         ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-10 16:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: fail the fault on a malformed swap entry instead of retrying it Breno Leitao
2026-08-11 15:38   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-12 10:50     ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-12 10:59   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-12 11:03     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-08-10 17:20 ` [PATCH 0/3] mm, swap: don't spin or flood the console on a bad swap entry Andrew Morton
2026-08-12 11:05   ` Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7238caa-cc47-4811-a395-4784350ba599@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    --cc=youngjun.park@lge.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox