From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
qiuxishi@huawei.com, Kani Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
slaoub@gmail.com, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: your mail
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:56:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9ff52f3-836e-db1e-2a2b-b60d71c53f69@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170420084930.GC15781@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 04/20/2017 10:49 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 20-04-17 09:28:20, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Thu 20-04-17 10:27:55, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> [...]
>>> Your patch try to add PageReserved() to __pageblock_pfn_to_page(). It
>>> woule make that zone->contiguous usually returns false since memory
>>> used by memblock API is marked as PageReserved() and your patch regard
>>> it as a hole. It invalidates set_zone_contiguous() optimization and I
>>> worry about it.
>>
>> OK, fair enough. I did't consider memblock allocations. I will rethink
>> this patch but there are essentially 3 options
>> - use a different criterion for the offline holes dection. I
>> have just realized we might do it by storing the online
>> information into the mem sections
>> - drop this patch
>> - move the PageReferenced check down the chain into
>> isolate_freepages_block resp. isolate_migratepages_block
>>
>> I would prefer 3 over 2 over 1. I definitely want to make this more
>> robust so 1 is preferable long term but I do not want this to be a
>> roadblock to the rest of the rework. Does that sound acceptable to you?
>
> So I've played with all three options just to see how the outcome would
> look like and it turned out that going with 1 will be easiest in the
> end. What do you think about the following? It should be free of any
> false positives. I have only compile tested it yet.
That looks fine, can't say immediately if fully correct. I think you'll
need to bump SECTION_NID_SHIFT as well and make sure things still fit?
Otherwise looks like nobody needed a new section bit since 2005, so we
should be fine.
> ---
> From 747794c13c0e82b55b793a31cdbe1a84ee1c6920 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:28:45 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: consider zone which is not fully populated to have holes
>
> __pageblock_pfn_to_page has two users currently, set_zone_contiguous
> which checks whether the given zone contains holes and
> pageblock_pfn_to_page which then carefully returns a first valid
> page from the given pfn range for the given zone. This doesn't handle
> zones which are not fully populated though. Memory pageblocks can be
> offlined or might not have been onlined yet. In such a case the zone
> should be considered to have holes otherwise pfn walkers can touch
> and play with offline pages.
>
> Current callers of pageblock_pfn_to_page in compaction seem to work
> properly right now because they only isolate PageBuddy
> (isolate_freepages_block) or PageLRU resp. __PageMovable
> (isolate_migratepages_block) which will be always false for these pages.
> It would be safer to skip these pages altogether, though.
>
> In order to do this patch adds a new memory section state
> (SECTION_IS_ONLINE) which is set in memory_present (during boot
> time) or in online_pages_range during the memory hotplug. Similarly
> offline_mem_sections clears the bit and it is called when the memory
> range is offlined.
>
> pfn_to_online_page helper is then added which check the mem section and
> only returns a page if it is onlined already.
>
> Use the new helper in __pageblock_pfn_to_page and skip the whole page
> block in such a case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 3 +++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 5 ++++-
> mm/sparse.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> index 3c8cf86201c3..fc1c873504eb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,19 @@ struct memory_block;
> struct resource;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> +/*
> + * Return page for the valid pfn only if the page is online. All pfn
> + * walkers which rely on the fully initialized page->flags and others
> + * should use this rather than pfn_valid && pfn_to_page
> + */
> +#define pfn_to_online_page(pfn) \
> +({ \
> + struct page *___page = NULL; \
> + \
> + if (online_section_nr(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn))) \
> + ___page = pfn_to_page(pfn); \
> + ___page; \
> +})
>
> /*
> * Types for free bootmem stored in page->lru.next. These have to be in
> @@ -203,6 +216,14 @@ extern void set_zone_contiguous(struct zone *zone);
> extern void clear_zone_contiguous(struct zone *zone);
>
> #else /* ! CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
> +#define pfn_to_online_page(pfn) \
> +({ \
> + struct page *___page = NULL; \
> + if (pfn_valid(pfn)) \
> + ___page = pfn_to_page(pfn); \
> + ___page; \
> + })
> +
> /*
> * Stub functions for when hotplug is off
> */
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 0fc121bbf4ff..cad16ac080f5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1143,7 +1143,8 @@ extern unsigned long usemap_size(void);
> */
> #define SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT (1UL<<0)
> #define SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP (1UL<<1)
> -#define SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT (1UL<<2)
> +#define SECTION_IS_ONLINE (1UL<<2)
> +#define SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT (1UL<<3)
> #define SECTION_MAP_MASK (~(SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT-1))
> #define SECTION_NID_SHIFT 2
>
> @@ -1174,6 +1175,23 @@ static inline int valid_section_nr(unsigned long nr)
> return valid_section(__nr_to_section(nr));
> }
>
> +static inline int online_section(struct mem_section *section)
> +{
> + return (section && (section->section_mem_map & SECTION_IS_ONLINE));
> +}
> +
> +static inline int online_section_nr(unsigned long nr)
> +{
> + return online_section(__nr_to_section(nr));
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> +void online_mem_sections(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +void offline_mem_sections(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn);
> +#endif
> +#endif
> +
> static inline struct mem_section *__pfn_to_section(unsigned long pfn)
> {
> return __nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn));
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index caa58338d121..98f565c279bf 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -929,6 +929,9 @@ static int online_pages_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> unsigned long i;
> unsigned long onlined_pages = *(unsigned long *)arg;
> struct page *page;
> +
> + online_mem_sections(start_pfn, start_pfn + nr_pages);
> +
> if (PageReserved(pfn_to_page(start_pfn)))
> for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn + i);
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 5d72d29a6ece..fa752de84eef 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1353,7 +1353,9 @@ struct page *__pageblock_pfn_to_page(unsigned long start_pfn,
> if (!pfn_valid(start_pfn) || !pfn_valid(end_pfn))
> return NULL;
>
> - start_page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn);
> + start_page = pfn_to_online_page(start_pfn);
> + if (!start_page)
> + return NULL;
>
> if (page_zone(start_page) != zone)
> return NULL;
> @@ -7686,6 +7688,7 @@ __offline_isolated_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> break;
> if (pfn == end_pfn)
> return;
> + offline_mem_sections(pfn, end_pfn);
> zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn));
> spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
> pfn = start_pfn;
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index 6903c8fc3085..79017f90d8fc 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -185,7 +185,8 @@ void __init memory_present(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> ms = __nr_to_section(section);
> if (!ms->section_mem_map)
> ms->section_mem_map = sparse_encode_early_nid(nid) |
> - SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT;
> + SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT |
> + SECTION_IS_ONLINE;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -590,6 +591,48 @@ void __init sparse_init(void)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> +
> +/* Mark all memory sections within the pfn range as online */
> +void online_mem_sections(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> +{
> + unsigned long pfn;
> +
> + for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> + unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(start_pfn);
> + struct mem_section *ms;
> +
> + /* onlining code should never touch invalid ranges */
> + if (WARN_ON(!valid_section_nr(section_nr)))
> + continue;
> +
> + ms = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
> + ms->section_mem_map |= SECTION_IS_ONLINE;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +/* Mark all memory sections within the pfn range as online */
> +void offline_mem_sections(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> +{
> + unsigned long pfn;
> +
> + for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
> + unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(start_pfn);
> + struct mem_section *ms;
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO this needs some double checking. Offlining code makes
> + * sure to check pfn_valid but those checks might be just bogus
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON(!valid_section_nr(section_nr)))
> + continue;
> +
> + ms = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
> + ms->section_mem_map &= ~SECTION_IS_ONLINE;
> + }
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> static inline struct page *kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long pnum, int nid)
> {
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-20 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-10 11:03 [PATCH -v2 0/9] mm: make movable onlining suck less Michal Hocko
2017-04-10 11:03 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: remove return value from init_currently_empty_zone Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 8:10 ` Balbir Singh
2017-04-13 12:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-13 19:43 ` YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-04-10 11:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm, memory_hotplug: use node instead of zone in can_online_high_movable Michal Hocko
2017-04-13 12:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-13 19:45 ` YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-04-10 11:03 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: drop page_initialized check from get_nid_for_pfn Michal Hocko
2017-04-13 12:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-10 11:03 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm, memory_hotplug: get rid of is_zone_device_section Michal Hocko
2017-04-10 16:20 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-04-10 16:31 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-13 13:05 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-17 20:12 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-04-18 7:19 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-10 11:03 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm, memory_hotplug: split up register_one_node Michal Hocko
2017-04-13 14:05 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-13 14:13 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-10 11:03 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm, memory_hotplug: do not associate hotadded memory to zones until online Michal Hocko
2017-04-10 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 " Michal Hocko
2017-04-20 8:25 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-20 9:06 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-20 10:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-10 11:03 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm, memory_hotplug: replace for_device by want_memblock in arch_add_memory Michal Hocko
2017-04-20 8:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-10 11:03 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm, memory_hotplug: fix the section mismatch warning Michal Hocko
2017-04-10 11:03 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm, memory_hotplug: remove unused cruft after memory hotplug rework Michal Hocko
2017-04-20 8:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-10 14:27 ` [PATCH -v2 0/9] mm: make movable onlining suck less Igor Mammedov
2017-04-10 14:56 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-10 15:22 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-10 15:31 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 8:01 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-04-11 8:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 9:53 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-04-11 10:47 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-10 16:02 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-18 8:23 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-10 16:09 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 6:38 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-04-11 9:23 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 9:59 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-04-11 11:01 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 11:38 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 12:38 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-10 15:43 ` Reza Arbab
2017-04-11 8:59 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-10 16:35 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-04-10 17:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 2:51 ` Balbir Singh
2017-04-11 17:03 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-17 21:51 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-18 7:14 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-18 16:42 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-18 19:54 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-20 3:37 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-15 12:17 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-15 12:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: consider zone which is not fully populated to have holes Michal Hocko
2017-04-18 8:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-18 9:27 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-19 11:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-19 12:16 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-19 12:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-19 12:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-15 12:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, compaction: skip over holes in __reset_isolation_suitable Michal Hocko
2017-04-15 12:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: __first_valid_page skip over offline pages Michal Hocko
2017-04-17 5:47 ` your mail Joonsoo Kim
2017-04-17 8:15 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-20 1:27 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-04-20 7:28 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-20 8:49 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-20 11:56 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2017-04-20 12:13 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-21 2:46 ` [lkp-robot] 73821bb516: WARNING:at_mm/memblock.c:#memblock_virt_alloc_internal kernel test robot
2017-04-21 8:05 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-21 4:38 ` your mail Joonsoo Kim
2017-04-21 7:16 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-24 1:44 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-04-24 7:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-25 2:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-04-26 9:19 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-27 2:08 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-04-27 15:10 ` Michal Hocko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-24 22:52 [PATCH v7 0/7] mseal system mappings jeffxu
2025-02-25 15:18 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-26 0:12 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-26 5:42 ` your mail Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-28 0:55 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-28 9:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-02-28 17:24 ` Jeff Xu
2025-02-28 17:30 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-10 19:01 [PATCH] maple_tree: Fix a few documentation issues, Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-15 19:27 ` your mail Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-15 21:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16 22:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-23 13:46 ` Liam R. Howlett
[not found] <20190225201635.4648-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
2019-02-26 23:49 ` Roman Gushchin
2012-10-04 16:50 Andrea Arcangeli
2012-10-04 18:17 ` your mail Christoph Lameter
2010-06-16 16:33 Jan Kara
2010-06-16 22:15 ` your mail Dave Chinner
2010-06-22 2:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-06-22 13:54 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-22 14:12 ` Wu Fengguang
[not found] <1131.86.55.168.2.1170690089.squirrel@mail.thinknet.ro>
2007-02-05 12:36 ` Joerg Roedel
2003-01-24 5:54 Anoop J.
2003-01-24 6:28 ` David Lang
2003-01-24 8:51 ` Anoop J.
2003-01-24 8:48 ` David Lang
2003-01-24 9:49 ` Anoop J.
2003-01-24 19:14 ` David Lang
2003-01-24 19:40 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-01-24 5:08 (unknown), Anoop J.
2003-01-24 5:11 ` your mail David Lang
2003-01-24 6:06 ` John Alvord
2003-01-25 2:29 ` Jason Papadopoulos
2003-01-25 2:26 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-25 17:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-01-25 23:10 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-26 8:12 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-21 14:54 raciel
2002-04-21 19:12 ` your mail William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-02 14:20 mehul radheshyam choube
2002-01-03 16:40 ` your mail Rik van Riel
2001-08-04 11:10 Mahmoud Taghizadeh
2001-08-04 13:18 ` your mail Francois Romieu
2001-06-08 1:36 jnn
2001-06-08 13:16 ` your mail Ralf Baechle
2000-09-04 12:01 Sahil
2000-09-04 15:35 ` your mail Rik van Riel
2000-03-28 8:19 pnilesh
2000-03-28 13:26 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-02-25 22:15 Rik van Riel
1998-02-25 22:48 ` your mail Linus Torvalds
1998-02-25 23:26 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9ff52f3-836e-db1e-2a2b-b60d71c53f69@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).