linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	adobriyan@gmail.com,  shakeel.butt@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	ak@linux.intel.com,  osandov@osandov.com, song@kernel.org,
	jannh@google.com,  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 08/10] bpf: decouple stack_map_get_build_id_offset() from perf_callchain_entry
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:32:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba3c59b71cc3f9260ed3373975972d560a511258.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240814185417.1171430-9-andrii@kernel.org>

On Wed, 2024-08-14 at 11:54 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Change stack_map_get_build_id_offset() which is used to convert stack
> trace IP addresses into build ID+offset pairs. Right now this function
> accepts an array of u64s as an input, and uses array of
> struct bpf_stack_build_id as an output.
> 
> This is problematic because u64 array is coming from
> perf_callchain_entry, which is (non-sleepable) RCU protected, so once we
> allows sleepable build ID fetching, this all breaks down.
> 
> But its actually pretty easy to make stack_map_get_build_id_offset()
> works with array of struct bpf_stack_build_id as both input and output.
> Which is what this patch is doing, eliminating the dependency on
> perf_callchain_entry. We require caller to fill out
> bpf_stack_build_id.ip fields (all other can be left uninitialized), and
> update in place as we do build ID resolution.
> 
> We make sure to READ_ONCE() and cache locally current IP value as we
> used it in a few places to find matching VMA and so on. Given this data
> is directly accessible and modifiable by user's BPF code, we should make
> sure to have a consistent view of it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> ---

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

[...]



  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-22 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-14 18:54 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 00/10] Harden and extend ELF build ID parsing logic Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-14 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 01/10] lib/buildid: harden " Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-14 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 02/10] lib/buildid: add single folio-based file reader abstraction Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-14 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 03/10] lib/buildid: take into account e_phoff when fetching program headers Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-14 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 04/10] lib/buildid: remove single-page limit for PHDR search Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-14 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 05/10] lib/buildid: rename build_id_parse() into build_id_parse_nofault() Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-14 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 06/10] lib/buildid: implement sleepable build_id_parse() API Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-14 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 07/10] lib/buildid: don't limit .note.gnu.build-id to the first page in ELF Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-14 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 08/10] bpf: decouple stack_map_get_build_id_offset() from perf_callchain_entry Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-22 20:32   ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-08-14 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 09/10] bpf: wire up sleepable bpf_get_stack() and bpf_get_task_stack() helpers Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-23 22:22   ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-26 16:19     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-14 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: add build ID tests Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-22 22:30   ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-22 22:55     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-22 23:07       ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-23 23:22 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 00/10] Harden and extend ELF build ID parsing logic Eduard Zingerman
2024-08-25 19:35   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-08-26 21:30   ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ba3c59b71cc3f9260ed3373975972d560a511258.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).