linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rui Teng <rui.teng@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: js1304@gmail.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] mm/page_alloc: recalculate some of zone threshold when on/offline memory
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:46:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc9e4751-c953-35bf-4fb7-eae3885d3d07@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461561670-28012-2-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

On 4/25/16 1:21 PM, js1304@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Some of zone threshold depends on number of managed pages in the zone.
> When memory is going on/offline, it can be changed and we need to
> adjust them.
>
> This patch add recalculation to appropriate places and clean-up
> related function for better maintanance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 71fa015..ffa93e0 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -4633,6 +4633,8 @@ int local_memory_node(int node)
>  }
>  #endif
>
> +static void setup_min_unmapped_ratio(struct zone *zone);
> +static void setup_min_slab_ratio(struct zone *zone);
>  #else	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
>
>  static void set_zonelist_order(void)
> @@ -5747,9 +5749,8 @@ static void __paginginit free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
>  		zone->managed_pages = is_highmem_idx(j) ? realsize : freesize;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>  		zone->node = nid;
> -		zone->min_unmapped_pages = (freesize*sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio)
> -						/ 100;
> -		zone->min_slab_pages = (freesize * sysctl_min_slab_ratio) / 100;
> +		setup_min_unmapped_ratio(zone);
> +		setup_min_slab_ratio(zone);

The original logic use freesize to calculate the
zone->min_unmapped_pages and zone->min_slab_pages here.
But the new function will use zone->managed_pages.
Do you mean the original logic is wrong, or the managed_pages will
always be freesize when CONFIG_NUMA defined?

>  #endif
>  		zone->name = zone_names[j];
>  		spin_lock_init(&zone->lock);
> @@ -6655,6 +6656,7 @@ int __meminit init_per_zone_wmark_min(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long lowmem_kbytes;
>  	int new_min_free_kbytes;
> +	struct zone *zone;
>
>  	lowmem_kbytes = nr_free_buffer_pages() * (PAGE_SIZE >> 10);
>  	new_min_free_kbytes = int_sqrt(lowmem_kbytes * 16);
> @@ -6672,6 +6674,14 @@ int __meminit init_per_zone_wmark_min(void)
>  	setup_per_zone_wmarks();
>  	refresh_zone_stat_thresholds();
>  	setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserve();
> +
> +	for_each_zone(zone) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +		setup_min_unmapped_ratio(zone);
> +		setup_min_slab_ratio(zone);
> +#endif
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  module_init(init_per_zone_wmark_min)
> @@ -6713,6 +6723,12 @@ int watermark_scale_factor_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  }
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +static void setup_min_unmapped_ratio(struct zone *zone)
> +{
> +	zone->min_unmapped_pages = (zone->managed_pages *
> +			sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio) / 100;
> +}
> +
>  int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  	void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
>  {
> @@ -6724,11 +6740,17 @@ int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  		return rc;
>
>  	for_each_zone(zone)
> -		zone->min_unmapped_pages = (zone->managed_pages *
> -				sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio) / 100;
> +		setup_min_unmapped_ratio(zone);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> +static void setup_min_slab_ratio(struct zone *zone)
> +{
> +	zone->min_slab_pages = (zone->managed_pages *
> +			sysctl_min_slab_ratio) / 100;
> +}
> +
>  int sysctl_min_slab_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  	void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
>  {
> @@ -6740,8 +6762,8 @@ int sysctl_min_slab_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  		return rc;
>
>  	for_each_zone(zone)
> -		zone->min_slab_pages = (zone->managed_pages *
> -				sysctl_min_slab_ratio) / 100;
> +		setup_min_slab_ratio(zone);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-28  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-25  5:21 [PATCH v2 0/6] Introduce ZONE_CMA js1304
2016-04-25  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] mm/page_alloc: recalculate some of zone threshold when on/offline memory js1304
2016-04-28  7:46   ` Rui Teng [this message]
2016-04-29  6:57     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-04-25  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mm/cma: introduce new zone, ZONE_CMA js1304
2016-04-26  9:38   ` Rui Teng
2016-04-29  7:04     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-04-25  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mm/cma: populate ZONE_CMA js1304
2016-04-25  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] mm/cma: remove ALLOC_CMA js1304
2016-04-25  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] mm/cma: remove MIGRATE_CMA js1304
2016-04-25  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] mm/cma: remove per zone CMA stat js1304
2016-04-25  5:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Introduce ZONE_CMA Joonsoo Kim
2016-04-28 10:39   ` Mel Gorman
2016-04-29  6:51     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-04-29  9:29       ` Mel Gorman
2016-05-02  6:14         ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-02  7:49           ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-05-03  1:29             ` Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bc9e4751-c953-35bf-4fb7-eae3885d3d07@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=rui.teng@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).