From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm, memory_hotplug: Initialize struct pages for the full memory section
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:49:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bcd0c49c-e417-ef8b-996f-99ecef540d9c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <476a80cb-5524-16c1-6dd5-da5febbd6139@redhat.com>
On 14.12.18 16:22, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 12.12.18 18:27, Mikhail Zaslonko wrote:
>> If memory end is not aligned with the sparse memory section boundary, the
>> mapping of such a section is only partly initialized. This may lead to
>> VM_BUG_ON due to uninitialized struct page access from
>> is_mem_section_removable() or test_pages_in_a_zone() function triggered by
>> memory_hotplug sysfs handlers:
>>
>> Here are the the panic examples:
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=y
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS=y
>>
>> kernel parameter mem=2050M
>> --------------------------
>> page:000003d082008000 is uninitialized and poisoned
>> page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p))
>> Call Trace:
>> ([<0000000000385b26>] test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160)
>> [<00000000008f15c4>] show_valid_zones+0x5c/0x190
>> [<00000000008cf9c4>] dev_attr_show+0x34/0x70
>> [<0000000000463ad0>] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc8/0x148
>> [<00000000003e4194>] seq_read+0x204/0x480
>> [<00000000003b53ea>] __vfs_read+0x32/0x178
>> [<00000000003b55b2>] vfs_read+0x82/0x138
>> [<00000000003b5be2>] ksys_read+0x5a/0xb0
>> [<0000000000b86ba0>] system_call+0xdc/0x2d8
>> Last Breaking-Event-Address:
>> [<0000000000385b26>] test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops
>>
>> kernel parameter mem=3075M
>> --------------------------
>> page:000003d08300c000 is uninitialized and poisoned
>> page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p))
>> Call Trace:
>> ([<000000000038596c>] is_mem_section_removable+0xb4/0x190)
>> [<00000000008f12fa>] show_mem_removable+0x9a/0xd8
>> [<00000000008cf9c4>] dev_attr_show+0x34/0x70
>> [<0000000000463ad0>] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc8/0x148
>> [<00000000003e4194>] seq_read+0x204/0x480
>> [<00000000003b53ea>] __vfs_read+0x32/0x178
>> [<00000000003b55b2>] vfs_read+0x82/0x138
>> [<00000000003b5be2>] ksys_read+0x5a/0xb0
>> [<0000000000b86ba0>] system_call+0xdc/0x2d8
>> Last Breaking-Event-Address:
>> [<000000000038596c>] is_mem_section_removable+0xb4/0x190
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops
>>
>> Fix the problem by initializing the last memory section of each zone
>> in memmap_init_zone() till the very end, even if it goes beyond the zone
>> end.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>> ---
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index 2ec9cc407216..e2afdb2dc2c5 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -5542,6 +5542,18 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone,
>> cond_resched();
>> }
>> }
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
>> + /*
>> + * If the zone does not span the rest of the section then
>> + * we should at least initialize those pages. Otherwise we
>> + * could blow up on a poisoned page in some paths which depend
>> + * on full sections being initialized (e.g. memory hotplug).
>> + */
>> + while (end_pfn % PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
>> + __init_single_page(pfn_to_page(end_pfn), end_pfn, zone, nid);
>> + end_pfn++;
>
> This page will not be marked as PG_reserved - although it is a physical
> memory gap. Do we care?
>
Hm, or do we even have any idea what this is (e.g. could it also be
something not a gap)?
For physical memory gaps within a section, architectures usually exclude
that memory from getting passed to e.g. the page allocator by
memblock_reserve().
Before handing all free pages to the page allocator, all such reserved
memblocks will be marked reserved.
But this here seems to be different. We don't have a previous
memblock_reserve(), because otherwise these pages would have properly
been initialized already when marking them reserved.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-14 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-12 17:27 [PATCH v2 0/1] Initialize struct pages for the full section Mikhail Zaslonko
2018-12-12 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] mm, memory_hotplug: Initialize struct pages for the full memory section Mikhail Zaslonko
2018-12-13 3:46 ` Wei Yang
2018-12-13 12:37 ` Zaslonko Mikhail
2018-12-13 15:12 ` Wei Yang
2018-12-14 9:33 ` Zaslonko Mikhail
2018-12-14 10:19 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-15 0:26 ` Wei Yang
2018-12-13 12:59 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-14 15:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-12-14 15:49 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2018-12-14 19:23 ` Gerald Schaefer
2018-12-17 9:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-12-17 12:28 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-17 13:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-12-17 13:35 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bcd0c49c-e417-ef8b-996f-99ecef540d9c@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=zaslonko@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox