Re: Plumbers 2018 - Performance and Scalability Microconference

[Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>]

On 09/05/2018 06:58 PM, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Christopher,
> 
> Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> writes:
> 
>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, Daniel Jordan wrote:
>>
>>>  - Promoting huge page usage:  With memory sizes becoming ever larger, huge
>>> pages are becoming more and more important to reduce TLB misses and the
>>> overhead of memory management itself--that is, to make the system scalable
>>> with the memory size.  But there are still some remaining gaps that prevent
>>> huge pages from being deployed in some situations, such as huge page
>>> allocation latency and memory fragmentation.
>>
>> You forgot the major issue that huge pages in the page cache are not
>> supported and thus we have performance issues with fast NVME drives that
>> are now able to do 3Gbytes per sec that are only possible to reach with
>> directio and huge pages.
> 
> Yes.  That is an important gap for huge page.  Although we have huge
> page cache support for tmpfs, we lacks that for normal file systems.
> 
>> IMHO the huge page issue is just the reflection of a certain hardware
>> manufacturer inflicting pain for over a decade on its poor users by not
>> supporting larger base page sizes than 4k. No such workarounds needed on
>> platforms that support large sizes. Things just zoom along without
>> contortions necessary to deal with huge pages etc.
>>
>> Can we come up with a 2M base page VM or something? We have possible
>> memory sizes of a couple TB now. That should give us a million or so 2M
>> pages to work with.
> 
> That sounds a good idea.  Don't know whether someone has tried this.

IIRC, Hugh Dickins and some others at Google tried going down this path.
There was a brief discussion at LSF/MM.  It is something I too would like
to explore in my spare time.

-- 
Mike Kravetz