From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm/memcg: Protect per-CPU counter by disabling preemption on PREEMPT_RT
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 21:31:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bdfc9791-4af2-f4fb-9ef5-dab1e2e3ff89@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211222114111.2206248-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
On 12/22/21 06:41, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The per-CPU counter are modified with the non-atomic modifier. The
> consistency is ensure by disabling interrupts for the update.
> This breaks on PREEMPT_RT because some sections additionally
> acquire a spinlock_t lock (which becomes sleeping and must not be
> acquired with disabled interrupts). Another problem is that
> mem_cgroup_swapout() expects to be invoked with disabled interrupts
> because the caller has to acquire a spinlock_t which is acquired with
> disabled interrupts. Since spinlock_t never disables interrupts on
> PREEMPT_RT the interrupts are never disabled at this point.
>
> The code is never called from in_irq() context on PREEMPT_RT therefore
How do you guarantee that these percpu update functions won't be called
in in_irq() context for PREEMPT_RT? Do you think we should add a
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq()) just to be sure?
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-23 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-22 11:41 [RFC PATCH 0/3] mm/memcg: Address PREEMPT_RT problems instead of disabling it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-22 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm/memcg: Protect per-CPU counter by disabling preemption on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-23 2:31 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2021-12-23 7:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-23 16:01 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-05 14:16 ` Michal Koutný
2022-01-13 13:08 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-13 14:48 ` Michal Koutný
2022-01-14 9:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-18 18:26 ` [PATCH] mm/memcg: Do not check v1 event counter when not needed Michal Koutný
2022-01-18 19:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-22 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/memcg: Add a local_lock_t for IRQ and TASK object Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-23 21:38 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-03 16:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-03 17:09 ` Waiman Long
2021-12-22 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm/memcg: Allow the task_obj optimization only on non-PREEMPTIBLE kernels Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-12-23 21:48 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-03 14:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-03 15:04 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-05 20:22 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-06 3:28 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-13 15:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-05 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] mm/memcg: Address PREEMPT_RT problems instead of disabling it Michal Koutný
2022-01-05 15:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bdfc9791-4af2-f4fb-9ef5-dab1e2e3ff89@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).