From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE134C11F65 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD8561CA5 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:35:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ABD8561CA5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1BA2C8D0194; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 04:35:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 142C48D017A; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 04:35:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id F24978D0194; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 04:35:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0067.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.67]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C668E8D017A for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 04:35:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D4322C10 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:35:11 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78309730422.05.A9A75F6 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by imf27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D833070000A2 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:35:08 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10030"; a="208132774" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,311,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="208132774" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Jun 2021 01:35:02 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,311,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="457132020" Received: from rongch2-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.171.220]) ([10.249.171.220]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Jun 2021 01:35:01 -0700 Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [linux-next:master 12896/14055] kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c:438:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'osnoise_trace_irq_entry' To: Steven Rostedt , kernel test robot Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Linux Memory Management List References: <202106291957.ayo0oPv1-lkp@intel.com> <20210629075300.177d5e47@oasis.local.home> From: "Chen, Rong A" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:34:58 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210629075300.177d5e47@oasis.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: imf27.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=none (imf27.hostedemail.com: domain of rong.a.chen@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.115) smtp.mailfrom=rong.a.chen@intel.com; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=intel.com (policy=none) X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D833070000A2 X-Stat-Signature: jttrzmd6zn1pjbrjin7hdbzdiqhm4hab X-HE-Tag: 1625042108-840392 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 6/29/2021 7:53 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 19:10:01 +0800 > kernel test robot wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, >> >> FYI, the error/warning still remains. > > Really? > > These were reported on Saturday (some people actually take off on weekends). > > I don't push any update that doesn't go through my test suite, which > usually takes around 13 hours to run. I received the fixes from Daniel > on Monday, and then kicked off my tests. Which *just* finished! > > Can we delay the pesky reminders for at least a week? > > -- Steve > Hi Steve, Thanks for the advice, we will do it asap. Best Regards, Rong Chen