linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm/filemap: fix that first page is not mark accessed in filemap_read()
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 13:47:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5f97e2f-8a48-2906-91a2-1d84629b3641@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqNW8cYn9gM7Txg6@casper.infradead.org>

On 6/10/22 10:36, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 03:34:11PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:10:03AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>>> On 2022/06/03 2:30, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 04:21:29PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>>>>> In filemap_read(), 'ra->prev_pos' is set to 'iocb->ki_pos + copied',
>>>>> while it should be 'iocb->ki_ops'.
>>>>
>>>> Can you walk me through your reasoning which leads you to believe that
>>>> it should be ki_pos instead of ki_pos + copied?  As I understand it,
>>>> prev_pos is the end of the previous read, not the beginning of the
>>>> previous read.
>>>
>>> Hi, Matthew
>>>
>>> The main reason is the following judgement in flemap_read():
>>>
>>> if (iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT !=	-> current page
>>>      ra->prev_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT)		-> previous page
>>>          folio_mark_accessed(fbatch.folios[0]);
>>>
>>> Which means if current page is the same as previous page, don't mark
>>> page accessed. However, prev_pos is set to 'ki_pos + copied' during last
>>> read, which will cause 'prev_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT' to be current page
>>> instead of previous page.
>>>
>>> I was thinking that if prev_pos is set to the begining of the previous
>>> read, 'prev_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT' will be previous page as expected. Set to
>>> the end of previous read is ok, however, I think the caculation of
>>> previous page should be '(prev_pos - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT' instead.
>>
>> OK, I think Kent broke this in 723ef24b9b37 ("mm/filemap/c: break
>> generic_file_buffered_read up into multiple functions").  Before:
>>
>> -       prev_index = ra->prev_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> -       prev_offset = ra->prev_pos & (PAGE_SIZE-1);
>> ...
>> -               if (prev_index != index || offset != prev_offset)
>> -                       mark_page_accessed(page);
>>
>> After:
>> +       if (iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT != ra->prev_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT)
>> +               mark_page_accessed(page);
>>
>> So surely this should have been:
>>
>> +       if (iocb->ki_pos != ra->prev_pos)
>> +               mark_page_accessed(page);
>>
>> Kent, do you recall why you changed it the way you did?
> 
> Oh, and if this is the right diagnosis, then this is the fix for the
> current tree:
> 
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -2673,8 +2673,7 @@ ssize_t filemap_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
>                   * When a sequential read accesses a page several times, only
>                   * mark it as accessed the first time.
>                   */
> -               if (iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT !=
> -                   ra->prev_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> +               if (iocb->ki_pos != ra->prev_pos)
>                          folio_mark_accessed(fbatch.folios[0]);
> 
>                  for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(&fbatch); i++) {
> 
> 

I think this is the fix we want - I think Yu basically had the right 
idea and had the off by one fix, this should be clearer though:

Yu, can you confirm the fix?

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] filemap: Fix off by one error when marking folios accessed

In filemap_read() we mark pages accessed as we read them - but we don't
want to do so redundantly, if the previous read already did so.

But there was an off by one error: we want to check if the current page
was the same as the last page we read from, but the last page we read
from was (ra->prev_pos - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT.

Reported-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>

diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 9daeaab360..8d5c8043cb 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2704,7 +2704,7 @@ ssize_t filemap_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct 
iov_iter *iter,
                  * mark it as accessed the first time.
                  */
                 if (iocb->ki_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT !=
-                   ra->prev_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT)
+                   (ra->prev_pos - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
                         folio_mark_accessed(fbatch.folios[0]);

                 for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(&fbatch); i++) {


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-10 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-02  8:21 [PATCH -next] mm/filemap: fix that first page is not mark accessed in filemap_read() Yu Kuai
2022-06-02 18:22 ` Andrew Morton
2022-06-06  1:11   ` Yu Kuai
2022-06-02 18:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-06-02 22:25   ` yukuai (C)
2022-06-06  1:10   ` Yu Kuai
2022-06-10 14:34     ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-06-10 14:36       ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-06-10 17:23         ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-10 17:47         ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2022-06-10 18:34           ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-06-10 18:48             ` Kent Overstreet
2022-06-11  8:23             ` Yu Kuai
2022-06-11 17:42               ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-06-13  1:31                 ` Yu Kuai
2022-06-09  0:59 ` Yu Kuai
2022-06-15  8:36 ` [mm/filemap] 8b157c14b5: phoronix-test-suite.fio.SequentialRead.LinuxAIO.Yes.Yes.4KB.DefaultTestDirectory.mb_s -8.1% regression kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c5f97e2f-8a48-2906-91a2-1d84629b3641@gmail.com \
    --to=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).