From: "Zhang, Dongsheng X" <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
To: Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Roger Wang <runanwang@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
jmattson@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 15/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MSR read/write tests
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:40:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c919e42a-01db-4969-9aa7-d0ae1792a6c9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231212204647.2170650-16-sagis@google.com>
On 12/12/2023 12:46 PM, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> The test verifies reads and writes for MSR registers with different access
> level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h | 5 +
> .../selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c | 27 +++
> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c | 209 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 241 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h
> index 63788012bf94..85ba6aab79a7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h
> @@ -9,11 +9,16 @@
> #define TDG_VP_VMCALL_REPORT_FATAL_ERROR 0x10003
>
> #define TDG_VP_VMCALL_INSTRUCTION_IO 30
> +#define TDG_VP_VMCALL_INSTRUCTION_RDMSR 31
> +#define TDG_VP_VMCALL_INSTRUCTION_WRMSR 32
Nit:
"arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h" already defined the following defs:
#define EXIT_REASON_IO_INSTRUCTION 30
#define EXIT_REASON_MSR_READ 31
#define EXIT_REASON_MSR_WRITE 32
> +
> void handle_userspace_tdg_vp_vmcall_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_io(uint64_t port, uint64_t size,
> uint64_t write, uint64_t *data);
> void tdg_vp_vmcall_report_fatal_error(uint64_t error_code, uint64_t data_gpa);
> uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_get_td_vmcall_info(uint64_t *r11, uint64_t *r12,
> uint64_t *r13, uint64_t *r14);
> +uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_rdmsr(uint64_t index, uint64_t *ret_value);
> +uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_wrmsr(uint64_t index, uint64_t value);
>
> #endif // SELFTEST_TDX_TDX_H
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c
> index e5a9e13c62e2..88ea6f2a6469 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c
> @@ -87,3 +87,30 @@ uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_get_td_vmcall_info(uint64_t *r11, uint64_t *r12,
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_rdmsr(uint64_t index, uint64_t *ret_value)
> +{
> + uint64_t ret;
> + struct tdx_hypercall_args args = {
> + .r11 = TDG_VP_VMCALL_INSTRUCTION_RDMSR,
> + .r12 = index,
> + };
> +
> + ret = __tdx_hypercall(&args, TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT);
> +
> + if (ret_value)
> + *ret_value = args.r11;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_wrmsr(uint64_t index, uint64_t value)
> +{
> + struct tdx_hypercall_args args = {
> + .r11 = TDG_VP_VMCALL_INSTRUCTION_WRMSR,
> + .r12 = index,
> + .r13 = value,
> + };
> +
> + return __tdx_hypercall(&args, 0);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
> index 699cba36e9ce..5db3701cc6d9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
> @@ -515,6 +515,213 @@ void verify_guest_reads(void)
> printf("\t ... PASSED\n");
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Define a filter which denies all MSR access except the following:
> + * MSR_X2APIC_APIC_ICR: Allow read/write access (allowed by default)
> + * MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE: Allow read access
> + * MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL: Allow write access
> + */
> +#define MSR_X2APIC_APIC_ICR 0x830
> +static u64 tdx_msr_test_allow_bits = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
Nit:
0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF is error prone to define? the following?
static u64 tdx_msr_test_allow_bits = ~0ULL;
> +struct kvm_msr_filter tdx_msr_test_filter = {
> + .flags = KVM_MSR_FILTER_DEFAULT_DENY,
> + .ranges = {
> + {
> + .flags = KVM_MSR_FILTER_READ,
> + .nmsrs = 1,
> + .base = MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE,
> + .bitmap = (uint8_t *)&tdx_msr_test_allow_bits,
> + }, {
> + .flags = KVM_MSR_FILTER_WRITE,
> + .nmsrs = 1,
> + .base = MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL,
> + .bitmap = (uint8_t *)&tdx_msr_test_allow_bits,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Verifies MSR read functionality.
> + */
> +void guest_msr_read(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t data;
> + uint64_t ret;
> +
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_rdmsr(MSR_X2APIC_APIC_ICR, &data);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + ret = tdx_test_report_64bit_to_user_space(data);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE, &data);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + ret = tdx_test_report_64bit_to_user_space(data);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + /* We expect this call to fail since MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL is write only */
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL, &data);
> + if (ret) {
> + ret = tdx_test_report_64bit_to_user_space(ret);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> + } else {
> + tdx_test_fatal(-99);
> + }
> +
> + tdx_test_success();
> +}
> +
> +void verify_guest_msr_reads(void)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> + uint64_t data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + vm = td_create();
> + td_initialize(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, 0);
> +
> + /*
> + * Set explicit MSR filter map to control access to the MSR registers
> + * used in the test.
> + */
> + printf("\t ... Setting test MSR filter\n");
> + ret = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_X86_USER_SPACE_MSR);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret, "KVM_CAP_X86_USER_SPACE_MSR is unavailable");
> + vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_X86_USER_SPACE_MSR, KVM_MSR_EXIT_REASON_FILTER);
> +
> + ret = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_X86_MSR_FILTER);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret, "KVM_CAP_X86_MSR_FILTER is unavailable");
> +
> + ret = ioctl(vm->fd, KVM_X86_SET_MSR_FILTER, &tdx_msr_test_filter);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0,
> + "KVM_X86_SET_MSR_FILTER failed, ret: %i errno: %i (%s)",
> + ret, errno, strerror(errno));
> +
> + vcpu = td_vcpu_add(vm, 0, guest_msr_read);
> + td_finalize(vm);
> +
> + printf("Verifying guest msr reads:\n");
> +
> + printf("\t ... Setting test MSR values\n");
> + /* Write arbitrary to the MSRs. */
> + vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_X2APIC_APIC_ICR, 4);
> + vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE, 5);
> + vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL, 6);
> +
> + printf("\t ... Running guest\n");
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + data = tdx_test_read_64bit_report_from_guest(vcpu);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(data, 4);
> +
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + data = tdx_test_read_64bit_report_from_guest(vcpu);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(data, 5);
> +
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + data = tdx_test_read_64bit_report_from_guest(vcpu);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(data, TDG_VP_VMCALL_INVALID_OPERAND);
> +
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(vcpu);
> +
> + kvm_vm_free(vm);
> + printf("\t ... PASSED\n");
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Verifies MSR write functionality.
> + */
> +void guest_msr_write(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t ret;
> +
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_wrmsr(MSR_X2APIC_APIC_ICR, 4);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + /* We expect this call to fail since MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE is read only */
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE, 5);
> + if (ret) {
> + ret = tdx_test_report_64bit_to_user_space(ret);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> + } else {
> + tdx_test_fatal(-99);
> + }
> +
> +
> + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_wrmsr(MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL, 6);
> + if (ret)
> + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> +
> + tdx_test_success();
> +}
> +
> +void verify_guest_msr_writes(void)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> +
> + uint64_t data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + vm = td_create();
> + td_initialize(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, 0);
> +
> + /*
> + * Set explicit MSR filter map to control access to the MSR registers
> + * used in the test.
> + */
> + printf("\t ... Setting test MSR filter\n");
> + ret = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_X86_USER_SPACE_MSR);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret, "KVM_CAP_X86_USER_SPACE_MSR is unavailable");
> + vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_X86_USER_SPACE_MSR, KVM_MSR_EXIT_REASON_FILTER);
> +
> + ret = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_X86_MSR_FILTER);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret, "KVM_CAP_X86_MSR_FILTER is unavailable");
> +
> + ret = ioctl(vm->fd, KVM_X86_SET_MSR_FILTER, &tdx_msr_test_filter);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0,
> + "KVM_X86_SET_MSR_FILTER failed, ret: %i errno: %i (%s)",
> + ret, errno, strerror(errno));
> +
> + vcpu = td_vcpu_add(vm, 0, guest_msr_write);
> + td_finalize(vm);
> +
> + printf("Verifying guest msr writes:\n");
> +
> + printf("\t ... Running guest\n");
> + /* Only the write to MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE should trigger an exit */
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> + data = tdx_test_read_64bit_report_from_guest(vcpu);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(data, TDG_VP_VMCALL_INVALID_OPERAND);
> +
> + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(vcpu);
> +
> + printf("\t ... Verifying MSR values writen by guest\n");
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_X2APIC_APIC_ICR), 4);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE), 0x1800);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL), 6);
> +
> + kvm_vm_free(vm);
> + printf("\t ... PASSED\n");
> +}
> +
> +
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> setbuf(stdout, NULL);
> @@ -531,6 +738,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> run_in_new_process(&verify_get_td_vmcall_info);
> run_in_new_process(&verify_guest_writes);
> run_in_new_process(&verify_guest_reads);
> + run_in_new_process(&verify_guest_msr_writes);
> + run_in_new_process(&verify_guest_msr_reads);
>
> return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-21 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 20:46 [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/29] KVM: selftests: Add function to allow one-to-one GVA to GPA mappings Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 1:43 ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-23 19:55 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-21 22:29 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-07-23 19:56 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/29] KVM: selftests: Expose function that sets up sregs based on VM's mode Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 2:18 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/29] KVM: selftests: Store initial stack address in struct kvm_vcpu Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 2:29 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/29] KVM: selftests: Refactor steps in vCPU descriptor table initialization Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 5:43 ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-23 21:25 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/29] KVM: selftests: Add helper functions to create TDX VMs Sagi Shahar
2024-02-22 9:24 ` Yan Zhao
2024-02-28 16:19 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-21 22:54 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-04-12 5:34 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Use KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES to validate TDs' attribute configuration Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 8:31 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Update load_td_memory_region for VM memory backed by guest memfd Sagi Shahar
2024-02-22 9:19 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-24 16:42 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-07-25 18:19 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX lifecycle test Sagi Shahar
2024-02-23 1:55 ` Chen Yu
2024-03-01 4:58 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-01 7:36 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:20 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-04-12 4:42 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-03-22 21:33 ` Chen, Zide
2024-07-25 19:52 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add report_fatal_error test Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 12:31 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-01 6:52 ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-25 20:37 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:09 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-12 4:56 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-04-12 11:57 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-15 8:05 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-04-15 10:09 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-16 18:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-17 22:41 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-22 21:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-07-28 11:16 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Adding test case for TDX port IO Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 13:20 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-04 2:19 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-04 9:16 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-04 9:18 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-25 22:35 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add basic TDX CPUID test Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 12/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add basic get_td_vmcall_info test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 6:03 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 13/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX IO writes test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 6:55 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 14/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX IO reads test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 8:22 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 15/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MSR read/write tests Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:00 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-01 12:09 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05 0:22 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:40 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X [this message]
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 16/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX HLT exit test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-02 7:31 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05 5:40 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-27 23:23 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 17/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MMIO reads test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 7:09 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:45 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 18/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MMIO writes test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-02 7:58 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05 8:58 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-30 19:03 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-21 23:46 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 19/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX CPUID TDVMCALL test Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 20/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Verify the behavior when host consumes a TD private memory Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 21/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDG.VP.INFO test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-06 4:50 ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 22/29] KVM: selftests: Add functions to allow mapping as shared Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 11:09 ` Yan Zhao
[not found] ` <DS7PR11MB7886BD37E5E56DAB9A0087A3F6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-16 6:24 ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 23/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add shared memory test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:02 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-06 1:36 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-06 1:20 ` Yan Zhao
[not found] ` <DS7PR11MB7886AA5F8A19CDFCB5566B0EF6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-16 6:24 ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 24/29] KVM: selftests: Expose _vm_vaddr_alloc Sagi Shahar
2024-03-04 9:55 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-06 1:49 ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 25/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add support for TDG.MEM.PAGE.ACCEPT Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 26/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add support for TDG.VP.VEINFO.GET Sagi Shahar
2024-03-04 13:56 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 27/29] KVM: selftests: Propagate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT to userspace Sagi Shahar
[not found] ` <DS7PR11MB78860170A5FD77253573BC09F6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-14 21:46 ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 28/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX UPM selftest Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 4:57 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-06 8:54 ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 29/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX UPM selftests for implicit conversion Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:10 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 20:15 ` Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:18 ` Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:42 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 20:56 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-05 21:34 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 21:44 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-21 2:51 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-21 20:52 ` Sagi Shahar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c919e42a-01db-4969-9aa7-d0ae1792a6c9@intel.com \
--to=dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=afranji@google.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=haibo1.xu@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=runanwang@google.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).