Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+805630f1453e490427fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: reject unsupported kmalloc sizes
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 18:49:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9c11ca3-8f78-4086-8549-5e99a4d79feb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DKZUH9SFMP6H.1ZMKA92IHQLG2@nvidia.com>

On 8/27/26 17:51, Zi Yan wrote:
> On Thu Aug 27, 2026 at 3:47 AM EDT, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
>> On 8/26/26 11:52 PM, Zi Yan wrote:
>>> On Wed Aug 26, 2026 at 5:47 PM EDT, Harry Yoo wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 11:28:12AM +0000, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
>>>>> On 8/17/26 22:40, Zi Yan wrote:
>>>>>> kmalloc is used to allocate physically contiguous memory for kernel
>>>>>> allocations. For requests larger than KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE, kmalloc uses
>>>>>> the page allocator and can only support up to KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE. For request
>>>>>> sizes bigger than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE, the page allocator can emit a WARN
>>>>>> because kmalloc allocates an order greater than MAX_PAGE_ORDER. Systems
>>>>>> with panic_on_warn=1 crash because of this WARN. Fix it by rejecting any
>>>>>> kmalloc size bigger than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: aadb4bc4a1f9 ("SLUB: direct pass through of page size or higher kmalloc requests")
>>>>>> Reported-by: syzbot+805630f1453e490427fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>>>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6a820ebc.9ebadd4d.20b15e.001b.GAE@google.com/
>>>>>> Tested-by: syzbot+805630f1453e490427fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>>>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> It fixes a page allocator warning (order > MAX_PAGE_ORDER) when gadgetfs
>>>>>> requests excessively large memory from kmalloc. Instead of adding
>>>>>> __GFP_NOWARN to suppress the warning, as was done for usbfs[1], change
>>>>>> kmalloc to return NULL without a warning for this specific issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] commit 4f2629ea67e72 ("USB: usbfs: Don't WARN about excessively large memory allocations")
>>>>>
>>>>> So I checked and for kvmalloc() we have in __kvmalloc_node_noprof()
>>>>>
>>>>>         /* Don't even allow crazy sizes */
>>>>>         if (unlikely(size > INT_MAX)) {
>>>>>                 WARN_ON_ONCE(!(flags & __GFP_NOWARN));
>>>>>                 return NULL;
>>>>>         }
>>>>>
>>>>> This comes from Linus in commit 7661809d493b4. I'd do the same thing here
>>>>> then.
>>>>
>>>> But the purpose of this patch is to avoid the warning in the page
>>>> allocator. Should we fix this in the caller (gadgetfs) then? 
>>> 
>>> It is fixed by: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260820223719.A4A3C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
>>> 
>>> Please disregard this patch, but we can keep the discussion going.
>>
>> I still think this patch has some value if done as proposed above. Yes
>> in practice it will just replace the page allocator's warning with a
>> different warning, but IMHO it's "nicer" if kmalloc() sanitizes its own
> 
> And SLAB maintainers will be Cc'd. :)

For some people it doesn't matter if it's SLAB or PAGE ALLOCATOR :D

>> requests to the page allocator, using the KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE value.
> 
> Like this? Or the exact pattern as kvmalloc() is preferred?

LGTM. Should return NULL even with __GFP_NOWARN or if the warning has fired
and won't again, and AFAICS this does.

The kvmalloc() pattern predates WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP addition, I think.

> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 0337e60db5ace..b562f2a6fbbee 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -5263,7 +5263,12 @@ static void *___kmalloc_large_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
>  {
>  	struct page *page;
>  	void *ptr = NULL;
> -	unsigned int order = get_order(size);
> +	unsigned int order;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE, flags))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	order = get_order(size);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(flags & GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK))
>  		flags = kmalloc_fix_flags(flags);
> 
> 



      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-27 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-17 20:40 [PATCH] mm/slab: reject unsupported kmalloc sizes Zi Yan
2026-08-18  2:59 ` Alan Stern
2026-08-18 23:46   ` Zi Yan
2026-08-26  9:28 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-08-26 13:36   ` David Laight
2026-08-26 22:02     ` Zi Yan
2026-08-26 21:47   ` Harry Yoo
2026-08-26 21:52     ` Zi Yan
2026-08-27  7:47       ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-08-27 15:51         ` Zi Yan
2026-08-27 16:49           ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c9c11ca3-8f78-4086-8549-5e99a4d79feb@kernel.org \
    --to=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=syzbot+805630f1453e490427fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox