From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: share event counter rather than duplicate
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:07:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc557aab1002120007v1dfdfac0te0c2a8b750919c15@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100212154857.f9d8f28e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:48 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Memcg has 2 eventcountes which counts "the same" event. Just usages are
> different from each other. This patch tries to reduce event counter.
>
> This patch's logic uses "only increment, no reset" new_counter and masks for each
> checks. Softlimit chesk was done per 1000 events. So, the similar check
> can be done by !(new_counter & 0x3ff). Threshold check was done per 100
> events. So, the similar check can be done by (!new_counter & 0x7f)
IIUC, with this change we have to check counter after each update,
since we check
for exact value. So we have to move checks to mem_cgroup_charge_statistics() or
call them after each statistics charging. I'm not sure how it affects
performance.
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 36 ++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> Index: mmotm-2.6.33-Feb10/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.33-Feb10.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.33-Feb10/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ static int really_do_swap_account __init
> #define do_swap_account (0)
> #endif
>
> -#define SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_THRESH (1000)
> -#define THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_THRESH (100)
> +#define SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_THRESH (0x3ff) /* once in 1024 */
> +#define THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_THRESH (0x7f) /* once in 128 */
>
> /*
> * Statistics for memory cgroup.
> @@ -79,10 +79,7 @@ enum mem_cgroup_stat_index {
> MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGIN_COUNT, /* # of pages paged in */
> MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGOUT_COUNT, /* # of pages paged out */
> MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAPOUT, /* # of pages, swapped out */
> - MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SOFTLIMIT, /* decrements on each page in/out.
> - used by soft limit implementation */
> - MEM_CGROUP_STAT_THRESHOLDS, /* decrements on each page in/out.
> - used by threshold implementation */
> + MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS, /* incremented by 1 at pagein/pageout */
>
> MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS,
> };
> @@ -394,16 +391,12 @@ mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(struct mem_cg
>
> static bool mem_cgroup_soft_limit_check(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> {
> - bool ret = false;
> s64 val;
>
> - val = this_cpu_read(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SOFTLIMIT]);
> - if (unlikely(val < 0)) {
> - this_cpu_write(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SOFTLIMIT],
> - SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_THRESH);
> - ret = true;
> - }
> - return ret;
> + val = this_cpu_read(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS]);
> + if (unlikely(!(val & SOFTLIMIT_EVENTS_THRESH)))
> + return true;
> + return false;
> }
>
> static void mem_cgroup_update_tree(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct page *page)
> @@ -542,8 +535,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_charge_statistics
> __this_cpu_inc(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGIN_COUNT]);
> else
> __this_cpu_inc(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGOUT_COUNT]);
> - __this_cpu_dec(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SOFTLIMIT]);
> - __this_cpu_dec(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_THRESHOLDS]);
> + __this_cpu_dec(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS]);
>
> preempt_enable();
> }
> @@ -3211,16 +3203,12 @@ static int mem_cgroup_swappiness_write(s
>
> static bool mem_cgroup_threshold_check(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> {
> - bool ret = false;
> s64 val;
>
> - val = this_cpu_read(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_THRESHOLDS]);
> - if (unlikely(val < 0)) {
> - this_cpu_write(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_THRESHOLDS],
> - THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_THRESH);
> - ret = true;
> - }
> - return ret;
> + val = this_cpu_read(mem->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS]);
> + if (unlikely(!(val & THRESHOLDS_EVENTS_THRESH)))
> + return true;
> + return false;
> }
>
> static void __mem_cgroup_threshold(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool swap)
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-12 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-12 6:44 [PATCH 0/2] memcg patches around event counting...softlimit and thresholds KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12 6:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg : update softlimit and threshold at commit KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12 7:33 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-02-12 7:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12 6:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: share event counter rather than duplicate KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12 7:40 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-02-12 7:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12 7:46 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2010-02-12 7:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12 8:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2010-02-12 8:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12 8:49 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2010-02-12 8:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12 9:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] memcg patches around event counting...softlimit and thresholds v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12 9:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg: update threshold and softlimit at commit v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12 9:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg : share event counter rather than duplicate v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-12 11:48 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2010-02-15 0:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-03-09 23:15 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-15 10:57 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2010-02-16 0:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc557aab1002120007v1dfdfac0te0c2a8b750919c15@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).