From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE78C433ED for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C72061166 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:27:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4C72061166 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id CD0466B007E; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 06:27:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id CA7D66B0080; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 06:27:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B1E3B6B0081; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 06:27:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0139.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.139]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B176B007E for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 06:27:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin39.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426A11832B5B2 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:27:16 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78008822472.39.5DC9923 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by imf30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B13FE000114 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:27:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1617877635; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5SgLDhmec/hRbace8E5HPCEtL8OCI8oMc6uREL2v7zo=; b=YbnsQdU8ctFuHuXMBOLAyU9BFMlyftcaS8YxlO8Z7TeLsEHUqleGYJJpEQOkRmz3dIGmSh jvF5fLSzKr7ZqRqtmMmD5FCJVNrSr+HLvJ7reHmCtzICF2cOgla1W/eK1XYR7/lnOjDEqf SM4nuJmnw2rXMF3wQDfs9/dJJD4CBj0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-501-cXUDpcIhOCqLL1mrwS6w2A-1; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 06:27:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: cXUDpcIhOCqLL1mrwS6w2A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E75410053E6; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.114.231] (ovpn-114-231.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.231]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4337060C0F; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] drivers/gpu/drm: don't select DMA_CMA or CMA from aspeed or etnaviv To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-MM , Joel Stanley , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Andrew Jeffery , Lucas Stach , Russell King , Christian Gmeiner , Mike Rapoport , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Linus Walleij , Michal Simek , Masahiro Yamada , Randy Dunlap , Peter Collingbourne , linux-aspeed , dri-devel , Linux ARM , The etnaviv authors , Linux Fbdev development list References: <20210408092011.52763-1-david@redhat.com> <20210408092011.52763-3-david@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:27:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7B13FE000114 X-Stat-Signature: 3wudmx8rmpm1wqm3k9a9m1pi47i6oxj5 Received-SPF: none (redhat.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf30; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; client-ip=216.205.24.124 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1617877629-755947 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 08.04.21 12:20, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 11:22 AM David Hildenbrand wrote: >> >> Random drivers should not override a user configuration of core knobs >> (e.g., CONFIG_DMA_CMA=n). Use "imply" instead, to still respect >> dependencies and manual overrides. >> >> "This is similar to "select" as it enforces a lower limit on another >> symbol except that the "implied" symbol's value may still be set to n >> from a direct dependency or with a visible prompt." >> >> Implying DRM_CMA should be sufficient, as that depends on CMA. >> >> Note: If this is a real dependency, we should use "depends on DMA_CMA" >> instead - but I assume the driver can work without CMA just fine -- >> esp. when we wouldn't have HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS right now. > > 'imply' is almost never the right solution, and it tends to cause more > problems than it solves. I thought that was the case with "select" :) > > In particular, it does not prevent a configuration with 'DRM_CMA=m' I assume you meant "DRM_CMA=n" ? DRM_CMA cannot be built as a module. > and 'DRMA_ASPEED_GFX=y', or any build failures from such > a configuration. I don't follow. "DRM_CMA=n" and 'DRMA_ASPEED_GFX=y' is supposed to work just fine (e.g., without HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS) or what am I missing? > > If you want this kind of soft dependency, you need > 'depends on DRM_CMA || !DRM_CMA'. Seriously? I think the point of imply is "please enable if possible and not prevented by someone else". Your example looks more like a NOP - no? Or will it have the same effect? -- Thanks, David / dhildenb