From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] tick/nohz: Move nohz_full related fields out of hot task struct's places
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:10:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd6d72c7-cdc7-4af6-b070-076f64887ee7@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250410152327.24504-5-frederic@kernel.org>
On 4/10/25 20:53, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> nohz_full is a feature that only fits into rare and very corner cases.
> Yet distros enable it by default and therefore the related fields are
> always reserved in the task struct.
>
> Those task fields are stored in the middle of cacheline hot places such
> as cputime accounting and context switch counting, which doesn't make
> any sense for a feature that is disabled most of the time.
>
> Move the nohz_full storage to colder places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index f96ac1982893..b5ce76db6d75 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1110,13 +1110,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> #endif
> u64 gtime;
> struct prev_cputime prev_cputime;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
> - struct vtime vtime;
> -#endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> - atomic_t tick_dep_mask;
> -#endif
> /* Context switch counts: */
> unsigned long nvcsw;
> unsigned long nivcsw;
> @@ -1438,6 +1432,14 @@ struct task_struct {
> struct task_delay_info *delays;
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
> + struct vtime vtime;
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> + atomic_t tick_dep_mask;
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION
> int make_it_fail;
> unsigned int fail_nth;
>
Hi Frederic.
maybe move these nohz related fields into their own cacheline instead?
on PowerPC where we have 128byte cache instead, i see
these fields are crossing a cache line boundary.
without patch:
/* XXX last struct has 4 bytes of padding */
struct vtime vtime; /* 2360 48 */
atomic_t tick_dep_mask; /* 2408 4 */
/* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
long unsigned int nvcsw; /* 2416 8 */
long unsigned int nivcsw; /* 2424 8 */
/* --- cacheline 19 boundary (2432 bytes) --- */
With patch:
struct vtime vtime; /* 3272 48 */
struct callback_head nohz_full_work; /* 3320 16 */
/* --- cacheline 26 boundary (3328 bytes) was 8 bytes ago --- */
atomic_t tick_dep_mask; /* 3336 4 */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-10 15:23 [PATCH 0/6 v3] sched/mm: LRU drain flush on nohz_full Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] task_work: Provide means to check if a work is queued Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched/fair: Use task_work_queued() on numa_work Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: Use task_work_queued() on cid_work Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] tick/nohz: Move nohz_full related fields out of hot task struct's places Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-23 18:40 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2025-07-01 12:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched/isolation: Introduce isolated task work Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-11 10:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-04-11 22:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-12 5:12 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: Drain LRUs upon resume to userspace on nohz_full CPUs Frederic Weisbecker
[not found] ` <20250412025831.4010-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-07-01 12:36 ` [PATCH 0/6 v3] sched/mm: LRU drain flush on nohz_full Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-03 14:07 [PATCH 0/6 v4] " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-03 14:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] tick/nohz: Move nohz_full related fields out of hot task struct's places Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-17 16:32 ` Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd6d72c7-cdc7-4af6-b070-076f64887ee7@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).