From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] mm/mmap: Restrict generic protection_map[] array visibility
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:46:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cecd8c0c-ebd8-91f1-bfe4-cc5da02b4223@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4830e415-cdbb-7050-ebd6-7480493655ef@csgroup.eu>
On 6/16/22 11:05, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
> Le 16/06/2022 à 06:09, Anshuman Khandual a écrit :
>> Restrict generic protection_map[] array visibility only for platforms which
>> do not enable ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT. For other platforms that do define
>> their own vm_get_page_prot() enabling ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT, could have
>> their private static protection_map[] still implementing an array look up.
>> These private protection_map[] array could do without __PXXX/__SXXX macros,
>> making them redundant and dropping them off as well.
>>
>> But platforms which do not define their custom vm_get_page_prot() enabling
>> ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT, will still have to provide __PXXX/__SXXX macros.
>>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h | 18 ------------------
>> arch/arm64/mm/mmap.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 ++
>> arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h | 19 -------------------
>> arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h | 19 -------------------
>> arch/x86/mm/pgprot.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mm.h | 2 ++
>> mm/mmap.c | 2 +-
>> 10 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index d564d0ecd4cd..8ed2a80c896e 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ struct mm_struct;
>> #endif /* !CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S */
>>
>> /* Note due to the way vm flags are laid out, the bits are XWR */
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
> This ifdef if not necessary for now, it doesn't matter if __P000 etc
> still exist thought not used.
>
>> #define __P000 PAGE_NONE
>> #define __P001 PAGE_READONLY
>> #define __P010 PAGE_COPY
>> @@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ struct mm_struct;
>> #define __S101 PAGE_READONLY_X
>> #define __S110 PAGE_SHARED_X
>> #define __S111 PAGE_SHARED_X
>> +#endif
>>
>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c
>> index 7b9966402b25..d3b019b95c1d 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c
>> @@ -551,6 +551,26 @@ unsigned long memremap_compat_align(void)
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memremap_compat_align);
>> #endif
>>
>> +/* Note due to the way vm flags are laid out, the bits are XWR */
>> +static const pgprot_t protection_map[16] = {
>> + [VM_NONE] = PAGE_NONE,
>> + [VM_READ] = PAGE_READONLY,
>> + [VM_WRITE] = PAGE_COPY,
>> + [VM_WRITE | VM_READ] = PAGE_COPY,
>> + [VM_EXEC] = PAGE_READONLY_X,
>> + [VM_EXEC | VM_READ] = PAGE_READONLY_X,
>> + [VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE] = PAGE_COPY_X,
>> + [VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE | VM_READ] = PAGE_COPY_X,
>> + [VM_SHARED] = PAGE_NONE,
>> + [VM_SHARED | VM_READ] = PAGE_READONLY,
>> + [VM_SHARED | VM_WRITE] = PAGE_SHARED,
>> + [VM_SHARED | VM_WRITE | VM_READ] = PAGE_SHARED,
>> + [VM_SHARED | VM_EXEC] = PAGE_READONLY_X,
>> + [VM_SHARED | VM_EXEC | VM_READ] = PAGE_READONLY_X,
>> + [VM_SHARED | VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE] = PAGE_SHARED_X,
>> + [VM_SHARED | VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE | VM_READ] = PAGE_SHARED_X
>> +};
>> +
> There is not much point is first additing that here and then move it
> elsewhere in the second patch.
>
> I think with my suggestion to use #ifdef __P000 as a guard, the powerpc
> changes could go in a single patch.
>
>> pgprot_t vm_get_page_prot(unsigned long vm_flags)
>> {
>> unsigned long prot = pgprot_val(protection_map[vm_flags &
>> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
>> index 61e6135c54ef..e66920414945 100644
>> --- a/mm/mmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
>> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static void unmap_region(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> * w: (no) no
>> * x: (yes) yes
>> */
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
> You should use #ifdef __P000 instead, that way you could migrate
> architectures one by one.
If vm_get_page_prot() gets moved into all platforms, wondering what would be
the preferred method to organize this patch series ?
1. Move protection_map[] inside platforms with ARCH_HAS_VM_PAGE_PROT (current patch 1)
2. Convert remaining platforms to use ARCH_HAS_VM_PAGE_PROT one after the other
3. Drop ARCH_HAS_VM_PAGE_PROT completely
Using "#ifdef __P000" for wrapping protection_map[] will leave two different #ifdefs
in flight i.e __P000, ARCH_HAS_VM_PAGE_PROT in the generic mmap code, until both gets
dropped eventually. But using "#ifdef __P000" does enable splitting the first patch
into multiple changes for each individual platforms.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-20 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-16 4:09 [PATCH V3 0/2] mm/mmap: Drop __SXXX/__PXXX macros from across platforms Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-16 4:09 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] mm/mmap: Restrict generic protection_map[] array visibility Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-16 5:35 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-20 5:16 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2022-06-20 6:41 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-21 9:44 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-16 12:44 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-20 4:45 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-20 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-20 6:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-16 4:09 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] mm/mmap: Drop generic protection_map[] array Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-16 5:27 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-16 6:10 ` hch
2022-06-17 3:46 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-16 5:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-16 6:12 ` hch
2022-06-17 3:29 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-17 5:48 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-17 8:00 ` hch
2022-06-20 4:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-17 3:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-06-17 5:40 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-16 5:22 ` [PATCH V3 0/2] mm/mmap: Drop __SXXX/__PXXX macros from across platforms Christophe Leroy
2022-06-16 6:13 ` hch
2022-06-17 3:07 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cecd8c0c-ebd8-91f1-bfe4-cc5da02b4223@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).