linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, andi@firstfloor.org, rientjes@google.com,
	lee.schermerhorn@hp.com, Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mempolicy: remove redundant check
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:19:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf18f8341003180619va7d06fbt5904592dedbc373d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268916463-8757-1-git-send-email-user@bob-laptop>

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
>
> Lee's patch "mempolicy: use MPOL_PREFERRED for system-wide
> default policy" has made the MPOL_DEFAULT only used in the
> memory policy APIs. So, no need to check in __mpol_equal also.
> Also get rid of mpol_match_intent() and move its logic directly
> into __mpol_equal().
>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/mempolicy.c |   16 +++++-----------
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index b88e914..17df048 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -1787,16 +1787,6 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_cond_copy(struct mempolicy *tompol,
>        return tompol;
>  }
>
> -static int mpol_match_intent(const struct mempolicy *a,
> -                            const struct mempolicy *b)
> -{
> -       if (a->flags != b->flags)
> -               return 0;
> -       if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(a))
> -               return 1;
> -       return nodes_equal(a->w.user_nodemask, b->w.user_nodemask);
> -}
> -
>  /* Slow path of a mempolicy comparison */
>  int __mpol_equal(struct mempolicy *a, struct mempolicy *b)
>  {
> @@ -1804,7 +1794,11 @@ int __mpol_equal(struct mempolicy *a, struct mempolicy *b)
>                return 0;
>        if (a->mode != b->mode)
>                return 0;
> -       if (a->mode != MPOL_DEFAULT && !mpol_match_intent(a, b))
> +       if (a->flags != b->flags)
> +               return 0;
> +       if (mpol_store_user_nodemask(a))
> +               return 0;
> +       if (!nodes_equal(a->w.user_nodemask, b->w.user_nodemask))
>                return 0;
>        switch (a->mode) {
>        case MPOL_BIND:

This patch is uncorrect, I have resend a new one :-)

> --
> 1.5.6.3
>
>

-- 
Regards,
-Bob Liu

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2010-03-18 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-18 12:47 [PATCH 2/2] mempolicy: remove redundant check Bob Liu
2010-03-18 13:19 ` Bob Liu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf18f8341003180619va7d06fbt5904592dedbc373d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lliubbo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).