From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux-am33-list@redhat.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/10] uaccess: better might_sleep/might_fault behavior
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 14:07:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1368702323.git.mst@redhat.com> (raw)
This improves the might_fault annotations used
by uaccess routines:
1. The only reason uaccess routines might sleep
is if they fault. Make this explicit for
all architectures.
2. Accesses (e.g through socket ops) to kernel memory
with KERNEL_DS like net/sunrpc does will never sleep.
Remove an unconditinal might_sleep in the inline
might_fault in kernel.h
(used when PROVE_LOCKING is not set).
3. Accesses with pagefault_disable return EFAULT
but won't cause caller to sleep.
Check for that and avoid might_sleep when
PROVE_LOCKING is set.
I'd like these changes to go in for the benefit of
the vhost driver where we want to call socket ops
under a spinlock, and fall back on slower thread handler
on error.
Please review, and consider for 3.11.
If the changes look good, what's the best way to merge them?
Maybe core/locking makes sense?
Note on arch code updates:
I tested x86_64 code.
Other architectures were build-tested.
I don't have cross-build environment for arm64, tile, microblaze and
mn10300 architectures. The changes look safe enough
but would appreciate review/acks from arch maintainers.
Version 1 of this change was titled
x86: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/
Changes from v1:
add more architectures
fix might_fault() scheduling differently depending
on CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, as suggested by Ingo
Michael S. Tsirkin (10):
asm-generic: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/
arm64: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/
frv: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/
m32r: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/
microblaze: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/
mn10300: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/
powerpc: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/
tile: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/
x86: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/
kernel: might_fault does not imply might_sleep
arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 4 ++--
arch/frv/include/asm/uaccess.h | 4 ++--
arch/m32r/include/asm/uaccess.h | 12 ++++++------
arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h | 6 +++---
arch/mn10300/include/asm/uaccess.h | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 16 ++++++++--------
arch/tile/include/asm/uaccess.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 2 +-
include/asm-generic/uaccess.h | 10 +++++-----
include/linux/kernel.h | 1 -
mm/memory.c | 14 +++++++++-----
11 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
Thanks,
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2013-05-16 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-16 11:07 Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-05-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] asm-generic: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/ Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] arm64: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 13:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] frv: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] m32r: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] microblaze: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] mn10300: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] powerpc: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 13:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-22 14:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 13:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 13:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 13:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] tile: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 13:33 ` Chris Metcalf
2013-05-16 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] x86: " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 11:16 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] kernel: might_fault does not imply might_sleep Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-16 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-19 9:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-19 12:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-19 13:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-19 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-19 16:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-19 20:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-19 20:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-21 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 13:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 9:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 20:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 20:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 9:25 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] uaccess: better might_sleep/might_fault behavior Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-22 9:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 11:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-22 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 13:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-22 14:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-22 14:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 14:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] kernel: drop voluntary schedule from might_fault Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 14:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] kernel: uaccess in atomic with pagefault_disable Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1368702323.git.mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-am33-list@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org \
--cc=linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=takata@linux-m32r.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).