From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF38DFB5EAA for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 03:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0CE756B03BF; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 23:24:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 07FA46B03C0; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 23:24:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id ED78F6B03C1; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 23:24:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF56C6B03BF for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 23:24:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658531A032B for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 03:24:24 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84561369648.30.D81C311 Received: from out30-119.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-119.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.119]) by imf21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFF81C0004 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 03:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf21.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.s=default header.b=EyTILYUb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass (imf21.hostedemail.com: domain of baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com designates 115.124.30.119 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1773890662; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:references:dkim-signature; bh=Z8ArazpuHzwIU8/sGdkPDAUgZ5Tq6d2MPt9c5EGHyCA=; b=trpg7mksuePzoZTKCGlFkB+fcjmC4e+8OjrFHVhE1Wbva1cXrb9FF6DKAVLds5F84cRvU0 TEj8/KdOMPbWtvE3RMgZYYWZ7fiZrMSi/zEVXiW2UHESDGJX8LNB+bdNYco3O1mswNfW/R KbEBvM3ePeLGPZPm/kUBfoYIntosdW0= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1773890662; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=mBL0ZLbzqe2Mv2mP5vEx/EvgCachxA2dOW1RnmIe+qpVGzEPw5btylRnDZV+pG2+nAe4Oa h/9NndlNe99tjtNkcjnccjyT+XcLBOeyVDA4+jkOI9k0BvVsALnS+NomtSGf+LkuKJUNPz ZMyDzjG1A9/mOtNjMjjtGsBbyWBFX0c= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf21.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.s=default header.b=EyTILYUb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass (imf21.hostedemail.com: domain of baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com designates 115.124.30.119 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1773890658; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=Z8ArazpuHzwIU8/sGdkPDAUgZ5Tq6d2MPt9c5EGHyCA=; b=EyTILYUbcZJcnd1smUvge8rFRD1LpYuRaDbj+hDft4CM6i8kVdB2FUWZe87xzXYqYGddH0ZtG27ugWwetFF2wBcra9yPFgVnqkiJjkyqJvfScTyqRIpwgQCZJVl2z3qSej5wz5ES2YZ+MAKltcSA2uNvZkf+oG3vdHQLxya7Du8= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R541e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam033045133197;MF=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=18;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0X.GnNVC_1773890655; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0X.GnNVC_1773890655 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:24:16 +0800 From: Baolin Wang To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org Cc: ljs@kernel.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org (open), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/6] change young flag check functions to return bool Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:23:59 +0800 Message-ID: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0EFF81C0004 X-Stat-Signature: rt3bdt85snupheyyw3ttuy63up5sb9ky X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1773890660-771631 X-HE-Meta: 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 ZSPBjaRz jHbW9u1qDL9hETWF9i2LhrabFXR8h0yZ9VEBx96cUd40voucaedhgLGZWtfgRcZrBZCMwfw981xoo+9bJE5SoxE1E7e/RtvZLZOqSWZR4d0x2w89NglbRIrr/oaFo6GwUVL/10e5rtiI9SpWnLh29DeUKCvKek7IbtjgWO5E5CqOYwiqPSptBRWt8Ny1CYqLmEO2HDhbIOyssGy76/dBDkgMOJFXgTxQh8QQly9MS621VGznqIyUgEetTB8S7scEKS0+RmhQK59xEj/138w+n8xVRFGpw05Mz34QUsWpwV72xxCuldmrY7h/Le1yQJyWhCRaF Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a cleanup patchset to change all young flag check functions to return bool, as discussed with David in the previous thread[1]. Since callers only care about whether the young flag was set, returning bool makes the intention clearer. No functional changes intended. Ran mm selftests on Arm64 and x86 machines, and no issues were found. Note that I only CC'd the arch mailing lists to avoid disturbing too many people. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/d172d6bf-c60c-4cf5-9da9-f30de38cdfed@kernel.org/ Baolin Wang (6): mm: change to return bool for ptep_test_and_clear_young() mm: change to return bool for ptep_clear_flush_young()/clear_flush_young_ptes() mm: change to return bool for pmdp_test_and_clear_young() mm: change to return bool for pmdp_clear_flush_young() mm: change to return bool for pudp_test_and_clear_young() mm: change to return bool for the MMU notifier's young flag check arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 29 ++++---- arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c | 8 +-- arch/microblaze/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- arch/parisc/include/asm/pgtable.h | 8 +-- arch/parisc/kernel/cache.c | 8 +-- arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/pgtable.h | 4 +- arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h | 26 +++---- arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/pgtable.h | 2 +- arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h | 4 +- arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c | 8 +-- arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 14 ++-- arch/riscv/mm/pgtable.c | 8 +-- arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 16 ++--- arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 20 +++--- arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c | 28 ++++---- arch/xtensa/include/asm/pgtable.h | 6 +- include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 76 +++++++++----------- include/linux/pgtable.h | 53 +++++++------- mm/internal.h | 16 ++--- mm/mmu_notifier.c | 20 +++--- mm/pgtable-generic.c | 14 ++-- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 40 +++++------ 22 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 209 deletions(-) -- 2.47.3