From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-f197.google.com (mail-qt0-f197.google.com [209.85.216.197]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4F06B5CEB for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 10:04:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt0-f197.google.com with SMTP id d18-v6so18856366qtj.20 for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2018 07:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com. [66.187.233.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t7-v6si3890000qkc.322.2018.09.01.07.04.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 01 Sep 2018 07:04:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 0/6] mm: online/offline_pages called w.o. mem_hotplug_lock References: <20180821104418.12710-1-david@redhat.com> <20180831205457.GB3945@techadventures.net> From: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 16:03:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180831205457.GB3945@techadventures.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Oscar Salvador Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, Andrew Morton , Balbir Singh , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Boris Ostrovsky , Dan Williams , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Haiyang Zhang , Heiko Carstens , John Allen , Jonathan Corbet , Joonsoo Kim , Juergen Gross , Kate Stewart , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Len Brown , Martin Schwidefsky , Mathieu Malaterre , Michael Ellerman , Michael Neuling , Michal Hocko , Nathan Fontenot , Oscar Salvador , Paul Mackerras , Pavel Tatashin , Philippe Ombredanne , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rashmica Gupta , Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Gleixner , Vlastimil Babka , YASUAKI ISHIMATSU On 31.08.2018 22:54, Oscar Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:44:12PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> This is the same approach as in the first RFC, but this time without >> exporting device_hotplug_lock (requested by Greg) and with some more >> details and documentation regarding locking. Tested only on x86 so far. > > Hi David, > > I would like to review this but I am on vacation, so I will not be able to get to it > soon. > I plan to do it once I am back. Sure, I won't be resending within next two weeks either way, as I am also on vacation. Have a nice vacation! > > Thanks > -- Thanks, David / dhildenb