From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: memcg/slab: Don't create unfreeable slab
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 17:32:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d767ff72-711d-976c-d897-9cea0375c827@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c90cf79-9c61-8964-a6fd-2da087893339@redhat.com>
On 5/3/21 4:20 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 5/3/21 8:22 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 5/2/21 8:07 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> The obj_cgroup array (memcg_data) embedded in the page structure is
>>> allocated at the first instance an accounted memory allocation happens.
>>> With the right size object, it is possible that the allocated obj_cgroup
>>> array comes from the same slab that requires memory accounting. If this
>>> happens, the slab will never become empty again as there is at least one
>>> object left (the obj_cgroup array) in the slab.
>>>
>>> With instructmentation code added to detect this situation, I got 76
>>> hits on the kmalloc-192 slab when booting up a test kernel on a VM.
>>> So this can really happen.
>>>
>>> To avoid the creation of these unfreeable slabs, a check is added to
>>> memcg_alloc_page_obj_cgroups() to detect that and double the size
>>> of the array in case it happens to make sure that it comes from a
>>> different kmemcache.
>>>
>>> This change, however, does not completely eliminate the presence
>>> of unfreeable slabs which can still happen if a circular obj_cgroup
>>> array dependency is formed.
>> Hm this looks like only a half fix then.
>> I'm afraid the proper fix is for kmemcg to create own set of caches for the
>> arrays. It would also solve the recursive kfree() issue.
>
> Right, this is a possible solution. However, the objcg pointers array should
> need that much memory. Creating its own set of kmemcaches may seem like an
> overkill.
Well if we go that way, there might be additional benefits:
depending of gfp flags, kmalloc() would allocate from:
kmalloc-* caches that never have kmemcg objects, thus can be used for the objcg
pointer arrays
kmalloc-cg-* caches that have only kmemcg unreclaimable objects
kmalloc-rcl-* and dma-kmalloc-* can stay with on-demand
memcg_alloc_page_obj_cgroups()
This way we fully solve the issues that this patchset solves. In addition we get
better separation between kmemcg and !kmemcg thus save memory - no allocation of
the array as soon as a single object appears in slab. For "kmalloc-8" we now
have 8 bytes for the useful data and 8 bytes for the obj_cgroup pointer.
Vlastimil
> Cheers,
> Longman
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-03 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-02 18:07 [PATCH 1/2] mm: memcg/slab: Prevent recursive kfree() loop Waiman Long
2021-05-02 18:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: memcg/slab: Don't create unfreeable slab Waiman Long
2021-05-03 12:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-03 14:20 ` Waiman Long
2021-05-03 15:32 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-05-03 16:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-05-03 17:21 ` Waiman Long
2021-05-03 20:15 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d767ff72-711d-976c-d897-9cea0375c827@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).