From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: axelrasmussen@google.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
baoquan.he@linux.dev, chenridong@xiaomi.com, david@kernel.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, kasong@tencent.com, lianux.mm@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
lyugaofei@xiaomi.com, mhocko@kernel.org, qi.zheng@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, stevensd@chromium.org,
wangzicheng@honor.com, weixugc@google.com, yuanchu@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/mglru: improve scan_folios() exhaustion detection
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 09:44:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d81c3050-37d7-4448-b1da-cdeb0521665d@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820045603.68809-3-baohua@kernel.org>
On 8/20/2026 12:56 PM, Barry Song (Xiaomi) wrote:
> Commit 16b475d2ac3c ("mm/mglru: avoid reclaim type fall back when
> isolation makes no progress") uses scanned == 0 to determine
> whether scan_folios() has exhausted a reclaim type. However,
> this is not always sufficient. It is possible for scanned > 0,
> while the oldest reclaimable generation is exhausted after the
> first scan_folios() call.
>
> We detect early_stop in scan_folios(). If we stop early for any reason,
> it means the current reclaim type is not exhausted yet. If early_stop is
> never reached, it means we have exhausted the current oldest generation
> without hitting any scanning limit.
>
> Another issue is that if the lruvec has 4 generations, we might have
> exhausted the oldest generation while the second oldest generation is
> still reclaimable. In that case, this type is not exhausted yet.
>
> Add an exhausted output argument to scan_folios() so it can
> explicitly report whether the reclaimable lists for the current
> type have been exhausted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index d5cc30b667ad..1f2e574b0061 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -4721,7 +4721,8 @@ static bool isolate_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, struct sca
>
> static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> struct scan_control *sc, int type, int tier,
> - struct list_head *list, int *isolatedp)
> + struct list_head *list, int *isolatedp,
> + bool *exhausted)
> {
> int i;
> int gen;
> @@ -4732,12 +4733,15 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> int skipped = 0;
> unsigned long remaining = nr_to_scan;
> struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
> + bool early_stop = false;
>
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_to_scan > MAX_LRU_BATCH);
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(list));
>
> - if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) == MIN_NR_GENS)
> + if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) == MIN_NR_GENS) {
> + *exhausted = true;
> return 0;
> + }
>
> gen = lru_gen_from_seq(lrugen->min_seq[type]);
>
> @@ -4768,8 +4772,10 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> skipped_zone += delta;
> }
>
> - if (!--remaining || max(isolated, skipped_zone) >= MIN_LRU_BATCH)
> + if (!--remaining || max(isolated, skipped_zone) >= MIN_LRU_BATCH) {
> + early_stop = true;
> break;
> + }
> }
>
> if (skipped_zone) {
> @@ -4778,8 +4784,10 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> skipped += skipped_zone;
> }
>
> - if (!remaining || isolated >= MIN_LRU_BATCH)
> + if (!remaining || isolated >= MIN_LRU_BATCH) {
> + early_stop = true;
> break;
> + }
> }
>
> item = PGSCAN_KSWAPD + reclaimer_offset(sc);
> @@ -4790,6 +4798,13 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> scanned, skipped, isolated,
> type ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
>
> + /*
> + * If we didn't stop early, all reclaimable folios in the current
> + * generation have been scanned. We are exhausted if this is the last
> + * reclaimable generation.
> + */
> + *exhausted = !early_stop &&
> + lrugen->min_seq[type] + MIN_NR_GENS == lrugen->max_seq;
> *isolatedp = isolated;
> return scanned;
> }
> @@ -4847,11 +4862,12 @@ static int isolate_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> bool type_fallback_allowed = !is_single_type_reclaim(swappiness);
> int type = get_type_to_scan(lruvec, swappiness);
> int total_scanned = 0, scanned, tier;
> + bool exhausted;
>
> retry:
> tier = get_tier_idx(lruvec, type);
> scanned = scan_folios(nr_to_scan, lruvec, sc,
> - type, tier, list, isolated);
> + type, tier, list, isolated, &exhausted);
>
> total_scanned += scanned;
> if (*isolated) {
> @@ -4864,7 +4880,7 @@ static int isolate_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> * We are running out of the current reclaim type. Fall back to
> * the other type if allowed.
> */
> - if (!scanned && type_fallback_allowed) {
> + if (exhausted && type_fallback_allowed) {
> type = !type;
> type_fallback_allowed = false;
> goto retry;
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
--
Best regards
Ridong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 4:56 [PATCH 0/3] mm/mglru: clean up isolate_folios and scan_folios for readability and clarity Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-20 4:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/mglru: improve readability of isolate_folios() Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-20 9:02 ` Baolin Wang
2026-08-20 9:22 ` Kairui Song
2026-08-20 4:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/mglru: improve scan_folios() exhaustion detection Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-21 1:44 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-08-20 4:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/mglru: retry the same type once if isolation fails due to races Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-08-21 1:45 ` Ridong Chen
2026-08-20 7:56 ` [PATCH 0/3] mm/mglru: clean up isolate_folios and scan_folios for readability and clarity Lian Wang (ProcessMission)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d81c3050-37d7-4448-b1da-cdeb0521665d@linux.dev \
--to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=lyugaofei@xiaomi.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=wangzicheng@honor.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox