From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: Imre Kaloz <kaloz@kernel.org>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
"Jose A . Perez de Azpillaga" <azpijr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/slab: sample slab_state once in kmem_cache_destroy()
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:21:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d966f16a-a2be-48c7-b31a-a2c7d3ef6d5c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014150844.8536-1-kaloz@kernel.org>
On 10/14/26 17:08, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> kmem_cache_release() tests slab_state >= FULL after kmem_cache_destroy()
> has dropped slab_mutex and unlinked the cache, and for a
> SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU cache after rcu_barrier(). If slab_late_init() runs
> before that test it sets slab_state to FULL but skips the unlinked cache,
> which never got a sysfs entry, so sysfs_slab_release() calls kobject_put()
> on a kobject that was never initialized:
>
> WARNING: lib/kobject.c:734 at kobject_put+0x64/0x2c0, CPU#1: kworker/u8:3/55
> kobject: '(null)' ((____ptrval____)): is not initialized, yet kobject_put() is being called.
> refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
> kobject_put+0x64/0x2c0
> sysfs_slab_release+0xc/0x20
> kmem_cache_destroy+0x104/0x1e0
> bioset_exit+0x13c/0x1e0
> disk_release+0x54/0x140
> put_disk+0x18/0x40
> floppy_async_init+0xbec/0xd10
>
> The release-time test has run outside slab_mutex since at least v4.4 for
> SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU caches, and since v6.0 for the others. Since v6.12
> the unlink-time test in kmem_cache_destroy() is a separate read of its
> own, also after mutex_unlock(), so the two can disagree. Both tests ask
It would be useful to mention the commits here along with the versions. Also
this suggests 3 commits but there's only 2 in Fixes. I would guess the 6.0
change is not a crucial one?
> whether the cache has a kobject, which cache creation skips while
> slab_state <= UP. UP is the state just below FULL, so a false sample
> cannot skip a kobject_put() that was owed.
>
> Seen on sparc64 at boot, where the asynchronous floppy init tears down
> its bio slab while the late initcalls are running.
>
> Sample slab_state once, under slab_mutex which slab_late_init() holds
> when it sets FULL, and use the result for both the unlink and the
> release.
>
> Fixes: d50d82faa0c9 ("slub: fix failure when we delete and create a slab cache")
> Fixes: 4ec10268ed98 ("mm, slab: unlink slabinfo, sysfs and debugfs immediately")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz <kaloz@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga <azpijr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Thanks!
> ---
> v2:
> - Changelog reworked around the release-time read outside slab_mutex,
> with the separate unlink-time test as the second read; Fixes:
> d50d82faa0c9 added, as discussed with Harry.
> - Correction to what I wrote in the v1 thread: the release-time read is
> older than d50d82faa0c9 (the RCU work function had it from v4.11
> until v6.12); d50d82faa0c9 added the unlink-time test under
> slab_mutex.
> - Added the explanation Jose asked for; his Reviewed-by from v1 is
> kept. The code is unchanged.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260930195110.13296-1-kaloz@kernel.org
>
> mm/slab_common.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index 7223a7596dab..de11edfd1a0b 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -515,10 +515,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_buckets_create);
> * and release of the kobject does not need slab_mutex or cpu_hotplug_lock
> * protection. So they are now done without holding those locks.
> */
> -static void kmem_cache_release(struct kmem_cache *s)
> +static void kmem_cache_release(struct kmem_cache *s, bool sysfs_ready)
> {
> kfence_shutdown_cache(s);
> - if (__is_defined(SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS) && slab_state >= FULL)
> + if (__is_defined(SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS) && sysfs_ready)
> sysfs_slab_release(s);
> else
> slab_kmem_cache_release(s);
> @@ -533,6 +533,7 @@ void slab_kmem_cache_release(struct kmem_cache *s)
>
> void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s)
> {
> + bool sysfs_ready;
> int err;
>
> if (unlikely(!s) || !kasan_check_byte(s))
> @@ -580,10 +581,18 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s)
>
> list_del(&s->list);
>
> + /*
> + * slab_late_init() sets slab_state to FULL under slab_mutex and adds
> + * sysfs entries only for caches still on the list. Sample the state
> + * here, so that a cache unlinked before that point is not handed to
> + * sysfs_slab_release() with an uninitialized kobject.
> + */
> + sysfs_ready = slab_state >= FULL;
> +
> mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
> cpus_read_unlock();
>
> - if (slab_state >= FULL)
> + if (sysfs_ready)
> sysfs_slab_unlink(s);
> debugfs_slab_release(s);
>
> @@ -593,7 +602,7 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s)
> if (s->flags & SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU)
> rcu_barrier();
>
> - kmem_cache_release(s);
> + kmem_cache_release(s, sysfs_ready);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_destroy);
>
>
> base-commit: 24a19b953e2a3d0ea5a8c4951a0ab8f32720c907
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 15:08 [PATCH v2] mm/slab: sample slab_state once in kmem_cache_destroy() Imre Kaloz
2026-10-14 19:46 ` Harry Yoo
2026-10-14 19:59 ` Harry Yoo
2026-10-14 19:54 ` Harry Yoo (Meta)
2026-10-15 7:21 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d966f16a-a2be-48c7-b31a-a2c7d3ef6d5c@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=azpijr@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kaloz@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox