linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, jannh@google.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, peterx@redhat.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
	ioworker0@gmail.com, baohua@kernel.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
	quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
	yangyicong@hisilicon.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	hughd@google.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] mm: Refactor MM_CP_PROT_NUMA skipping case into new function
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 12:25:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc0b5e94-f5aa-407e-bad2-150814dc4885@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250718090244.21092-2-dev.jain@arm.com>

On 18/07/2025 10:02, Dev Jain wrote:
> Reduce indentation by refactoring the prot_numa case into a new function.
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> ---
>  mm/mprotect.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> index 88709c01177b..2a9c73bd0778 100644
> --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,59 @@ bool can_change_pte_writable(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>  	return pte_dirty(pte);
>  }
>  
> +static bool prot_numa_skip(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> +			   pte_t oldpte, pte_t *pte, int target_node)
> +{
> +	struct folio *folio;
> +	bool toptier;
> +	int nid;
> +
> +	/* Avoid TLB flush if possible */
> +	if (pte_protnone(oldpte))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	folio = vm_normal_folio(vma, addr, oldpte);
> +	if (!folio)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (folio_is_zone_device(folio) || folio_test_ksm(folio))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	/* Also skip shared copy-on-write pages */
> +	if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags) &&
> +	    (folio_maybe_dma_pinned(folio) || folio_maybe_mapped_shared(folio)))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * While migration can move some dirty pages,
> +	 * it cannot move them all from MIGRATE_ASYNC
> +	 * context.
> +	 */
> +	if (folio_is_file_lru(folio) && folio_test_dirty(folio))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Don't mess with PTEs if page is already on the node
> +	 * a single-threaded process is running on.
> +	 */
> +	nid = folio_nid(folio);
> +	if (target_node == nid)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	toptier = node_is_toptier(nid);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa
> +	 * balancing is disabled
> +	 */
> +	if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) && toptier)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (folio_use_access_time(folio))
> +		folio_xchg_access_time(folio, jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies));

Perhaps this bit should be kept in the original location? It's got nothing to do
with determining if the pte should be skipped.

Thanks,
Ryan

> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  		struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>  		unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot, unsigned long cp_flags)
> @@ -117,53 +170,9 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  			 * pages. See similar comment in change_huge_pmd.
>  			 */
>  			if (prot_numa) {
> -				struct folio *folio;
> -				int nid;
> -				bool toptier;
> -
> -				/* Avoid TLB flush if possible */
> -				if (pte_protnone(oldpte))
> -					continue;
> -
> -				folio = vm_normal_folio(vma, addr, oldpte);
> -				if (!folio || folio_is_zone_device(folio) ||
> -				    folio_test_ksm(folio))
> -					continue;
> -
> -				/* Also skip shared copy-on-write pages */
> -				if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags) &&
> -				    (folio_maybe_dma_pinned(folio) ||
> -				     folio_maybe_mapped_shared(folio)))
> -					continue;
> -
> -				/*
> -				 * While migration can move some dirty pages,
> -				 * it cannot move them all from MIGRATE_ASYNC
> -				 * context.
> -				 */
> -				if (folio_is_file_lru(folio) &&
> -				    folio_test_dirty(folio))
> -					continue;
> -
> -				/*
> -				 * Don't mess with PTEs if page is already on the node
> -				 * a single-threaded process is running on.
> -				 */
> -				nid = folio_nid(folio);
> -				if (target_node == nid)
> -					continue;
> -				toptier = node_is_toptier(nid);
> -
> -				/*
> -				 * Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa
> -				 * balancing is disabled
> -				 */
> -				if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) &&
> -				    toptier)
> +				if (prot_numa_skip(vma, addr, oldpte, pte,
> +						   target_node))
>  					continue;
> -				if (folio_use_access_time(folio))
> -					folio_xchg_access_time(folio,
> -						jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies));
>  			}
>  
>  			oldpte = ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, addr, pte);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-22 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-18  9:02 [PATCH v5 0/7] Optimize mprotect() for large folios Dev Jain
2025-07-18  9:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] mm: Refactor MM_CP_PROT_NUMA skipping case into new function Dev Jain
2025-07-18 16:19   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-20 23:44   ` Barry Song
2025-07-21  3:44     ` Dev Jain
2025-07-22 11:05       ` Dev Jain
2025-07-22 11:25   ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-07-23 13:57   ` Zi Yan
2025-07-18  9:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() for MM_CP_PROT_NUMA by batch-skipping PTEs Dev Jain
2025-07-18 16:40   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-22 11:26   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-23 14:25   ` Zi Yan
2025-07-18  9:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-07-18 17:05   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-20 23:59   ` Barry Song
2025-07-22 11:35   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-23 15:09   ` Zi Yan
2025-07-18  9:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] mm: Introduce FPB_RESPECT_WRITE for PTE batching infrastructure Dev Jain
2025-07-18 17:12   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-22 11:37   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-23 15:28   ` Zi Yan
2025-07-23 15:32     ` Dev Jain
2025-07-18  9:02 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] mm: Split can_change_pte_writable() into private and shared parts Dev Jain
2025-07-18 17:27   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-23 15:40   ` Zi Yan
2025-07-18  9:02 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() by PTE batching Dev Jain
2025-07-18 18:49   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-19 13:46     ` Dev Jain
2025-07-20 11:20       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-20 14:39         ` Dev Jain
2025-07-24 19:55   ` Zi Yan
2025-08-06  8:08   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06  8:12     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06  8:15     ` Will Deacon
2025-08-06  8:19       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06  8:53     ` Dev Jain
2025-08-06  8:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06  9:12     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-06  9:21       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06  9:37         ` Dev Jain
2025-08-06  9:50           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-06 10:04             ` Dev Jain
2025-08-06 10:07               ` Dev Jain
2025-08-06 10:12               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 10:11             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 10:20               ` Dev Jain
2025-08-06 10:28                 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 10:45                 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-06 10:45               ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-18  9:02 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] arm64: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-07-18 18:50   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-21 15:57   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-07-18  9:50 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] Optimize mprotect() for large folios Dev Jain
2025-07-18 18:53   ` Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc0b5e94-f5aa-407e-bad2-150814dc4885@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).