From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-f199.google.com (mail-qt1-f199.google.com [209.85.160.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E818D6B7474 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 08:04:46 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt1-f199.google.com with SMTP id u32so20782201qte.1 for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 05:04:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d1si5847287qki.160.2018.12.05.05.04.46 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Dec 2018 05:04:46 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] mm: PG_reserved cleanups and documentation References: <20181205122851.5891-1-david@redhat.com> <20181205125607.GM1286@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:04:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181205125607.GM1286@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Albert Ou , Alexander Duyck , Andrew Morton , Anthony Yznaga , Arnd Bergmann , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Bhupesh Sharma , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , Dan Williams , Dave Kleikamp , David Airlie , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Heiko Carstens , James Morse , Kees Cook , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Martin Schwidefsky , Matthew Wilcox , Michael Ellerman , Mike Rapoport , Miles Chen , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Mackerras , Pavel Tatashin , Souptick Joarder , Stephen Rothwell , Tobias Klauser , Vasily Gorbik , Will Deacon On 05.12.18 13:56, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 05-12-18 13:28:44, David Hildenbrand wrote: > [...] >> Most notably, for device memory we can hopefully soon stop setting >> it PG_reserved > > I am busy as hell so I am not likely to look at specific patche this > week. But could you be more specific why we need to get rid of other > PG_reserved users before we can do so for device memory? > No worries, this has time. For device memory, nothing should really be needed. I am only collecting and docuumenting users and this is one user soon to go (eventually) :) > I am all for removing relicts because they just confuse people but I > fail to see any relation here. > It's really only "why is this patch set not bigger", nothing related to device memory actually :) -- Thanks, David / dhildenb