From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure: fix VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(page)) when unpoison memory
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 11:01:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de73f251-08a0-4122-acfd-1d7fce7540ea@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f8107e2-2b37-d899-f7f2-5a6093d8b089@huawei.com>
On 16.07.24 04:34, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2024/7/16 0:16, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 15.07.24 08:23, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>> On 2024/7/13 5:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:42:49 +0800 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> When I did memory failure tests recently, below panic occurs:
>>>>>
>>>>> page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(page))
>>>>> kernel BUG at include/linux/page-flags.h:616!
>>>>> Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
>>>>> CPU: 3 PID: 720 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1-00195-g148743902568 #40
>>>>> RIP: 0010:unpoison_memory+0x2f3/0x590
>>>>> RSP: 0018:ffffa57fc8787d60 EFLAGS: 00000246
>>>>> RAX: 0000000000000037 RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: ffff9be25fcdc9c8
>>>>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff9be25fcdc9c0
>>>>> RBP: 0000000000300000 R08: ffffffffb4956f88 R09: 0000000000009ffb
>>>>> R10: 0000000000000284 R11: ffffffffb4926fa0 R12: ffffe6b00c000000
>>>>> R13: ffff9bdb453dfd00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: fffffffffffffffe
>>>>> FS: 00007f08f04e4740(0000) GS:ffff9be25fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>>> CR2: 0000564787a30410 CR3: 000000010d4e2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
>>>>> Call Trace:
>>>>> <TASK>
>>>>> unpoison_memory+0x2f3/0x590
>>>>> simple_attr_write_xsigned.constprop.0.isra.0+0xb3/0x110
>>>>> debugfs_attr_write+0x42/0x60
>>>>> full_proxy_write+0x5b/0x80
>>>>> vfs_write+0xd5/0x540
>>>>> ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
>>>>> do_syscall_64+0xb9/0x1d0
>>>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>>>>> RIP: 0033:0x7f08f0314887
>>>>> RSP: 002b:00007ffece710078 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
>>>>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: 00007f08f0314887
>>>>> RDX: 0000000000000009 RSI: 0000564787a30410 RDI: 0000000000000001
>>>>> RBP: 0000564787a30410 R08: 000000000000fefe R09: 000000007fffffff
>>>>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000009
>>>>> R13: 00007f08f041b780 R14: 00007f08f0417600 R15: 00007f08f0416a00
>>>>> </TASK>
>>>>> Modules linked in: hwpoison_inject
>>>>> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>>>> RIP: 0010:unpoison_memory+0x2f3/0x590
>>>>> RSP: 0018:ffffa57fc8787d60 EFLAGS: 00000246
>>>>> RAX: 0000000000000037 RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: ffff9be25fcdc9c8
>>>>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff9be25fcdc9c0
>>>>> RBP: 0000000000300000 R08: ffffffffb4956f88 R09: 0000000000009ffb
>>>>> R10: 0000000000000284 R11: ffffffffb4926fa0 R12: ffffe6b00c000000
>>>>> R13: ffff9bdb453dfd00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: fffffffffffffffe
>>>>> FS: 00007f08f04e4740(0000) GS:ffff9be25fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>>> CR2: 0000564787a30410 CR3: 000000010d4e2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
>>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
>>>>> Kernel Offset: 0x31c00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
>>>>> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]---
>>>>>
>>>>> The root cause is that unpoison_memory() tries to check the PG_HWPoison
>>>>> flags of an uninitialized page. So VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(page)) is
>>>>> triggered.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not seeing the call path. Is this BUG happening via
>>>>
>>>> static __always_inline void __ClearPage##uname(struct page *page) \
>>>> { \
>>>> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!Page##uname(page), page); \
>>>> page->page_type |= PG_##lname; \
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> If so, where's the callsite?
>>>
>>> It is BUG on PF_ANY():
>>>
>>> PAGEFLAG(HWPoison, hwpoison, PF_ANY)
>>>
>>> #define PF_ANY(page, enforce) PF_POISONED_CHECK(page)
>>>
>>> #define PF_POISONED_CHECK(page) ({ \
>>> VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(PagePoisoned(page), page); \
>>> page; })
>>>
>>> #define PAGE_POISON_PATTERN -1l
>>> static inline int PagePoisoned(const struct page *page)
>>> {
>>> return READ_ONCE(page->flags) == PAGE_POISON_PATTERN;
>>> }
>>>
>>> The offlined pages will have page->flags set to PAGE_POISON_PATTERN while pfn is still valid:
>>>
>>> offline_pages
>>> remove_pfn_range_from_zone
>>> page_init_poison
>>> memset(page, PAGE_POISON_PATTERN, size);
>>
>> Worth noting that this happens after __offline_isolated_pages() marked the covering sections as offline.
>>
>> Are we missing a pfn_to_online_page() check somewhere, or are we racing with offlining code that marks the section offline?
>
> I was thinking about to use pfn_to_online_page() instead of pfn_to_page() in unpoison_memory() so we can get rid of offlined pages.
> But there're ZONE_DEVICE pages. They're not-onlined too. And unpoison_memory() should work for them. So we can't simply use
> pfn_to_online_page() in that. Or am I miss something?
Right, pfn_to_online_page() does not detect ZONE_DEVICE. That has to be
handled separately if pfn_to_online_page() would fail.
... which is what we do in memory_failure():
p = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
if (!p) {
if (pfn_valid(pfn)) {
pgmap = get_dev_pagemap(pfn, NULL);
put_ref_page(pfn, flags);
if (pgmap) {
...
}
}
...
}
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-17 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-12 6:42 [PATCH] mm/memory-failure: fix VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(page)) when unpoison memory Miaohe Lin
2024-07-12 21:09 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-15 6:23 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-07-15 16:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-16 2:34 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-07-17 9:01 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-07-18 3:04 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-07-18 5:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 3:55 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-08-01 20:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-05 6:25 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-12-01 6:59 ` Andrew Morton
2024-12-02 3:32 ` Miaohe Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de73f251-08a0-4122-acfd-1d7fce7540ea@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).