linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Chintan Pandya <cpandya@codeaurora.org>,
	Jun Yao <yaojun8558363@gmail.com>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:58:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfc727b4-0806-4867-2f9c-0bb8fdd459ad@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190310011906.254635-3-yuzhao@google.com>

On 03/10/2019 06:49 AM, Yu Zhao wrote:
> Switch from per mm_struct to per pmd page table lock by enabling
> ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK. This provides better granularity for
> large system.
> 
> I'm not sure if there is contention on mm->page_table_lock. Given
> the option comes at no cost (apart from initializing more spin
> locks), why not enable it now.
> 
> We only do so when pmd is not folded, so we don't mistakenly call
> pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() on pud or p4d in pgd_pgtable_alloc(). (We
> check shift against PMD_SHIFT, which is same as PUD_SHIFT when pmd
> is folded).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig               |  3 +++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h | 12 +++++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h     |  5 ++++-
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index cfbf307d6dc4..a3b1b789f766 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -872,6 +872,9 @@ config ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE
>  config ARCH_HAS_CACHE_LINE_SIZE
>  	def_bool y
>  
> +config ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK
> +	def_bool y if PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2
> +
>  config SECCOMP
>  	bool "Enable seccomp to safely compute untrusted bytecode"
>  	---help---
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 52fa47c73bf0..dabba4b2c61f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -33,12 +33,22 @@
>  
>  static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
>  {
> -	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	struct page *page;
> +
> +	page = alloc_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	if (!page)
> +		return NULL;
> +	if (!pgtable_pmd_page_ctor(page)) {
> +		__free_page(page);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +	return page_address(page);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmdp)
>  {
>  	BUG_ON((unsigned long)pmdp & (PAGE_SIZE-1));
> +	pgtable_pmd_page_dtor(virt_to_page(pmdp));
>  	free_page((unsigned long)pmdp);
>  }

There is just one problem here. ARM KVM's stage2_pmd_free() calls into pmd_free() on a page
originally allocated with __get_free_page() and never went through pgtable_pmd_page_ctor().
So when ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK is enabled

stage2_pmd_free()
	pgtable_pmd_page_dtor()
		ptlock_free()
			kmem_cache_free(page_ptl_cachep, page->ptl)

Though SLUB implementation for kmem_cache_free() seems to be handling NULL page->ptl (as the
page never got it's lock allocated or initialized) correctly I am not sure if it is a right
thing to do.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-11  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-14 21:16 [PATCH] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 15:12 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-18 19:49   ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 20:48     ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-19  4:09     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-18 23:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 23:13   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: mm: don't call page table ctors for init_mm Yu Zhao
2019-02-26 15:13     ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-09  3:52       ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-18 23:13   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock Yu Zhao
2019-02-19  4:21   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-19  5:32     ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-19  6:17       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-19 22:28         ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-20 10:27           ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-20 12:24             ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20 20:22             ` Yu Zhao
2019-02-20 20:59               ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20  1:34         ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-20  3:20           ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-02-20 21:03       ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-02-26 15:12   ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-09  4:01     ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-10  1:19   ` [PATCH v3 " Yu Zhao
2019-03-10  1:19     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: mm: don't call page table ctors for init_mm Yu Zhao
2019-03-10  1:19     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock Yu Zhao
2019-03-11  8:28       ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2019-03-11 23:10         ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-11 12:12       ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-11 12:57         ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-11 23:11         ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-11  7:45     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: mm: use appropriate ctors for page tables Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-11 23:23       ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57     ` [PATCH v4 1/4] " Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57       ` [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: mm: don't call page table ctors for init_mm Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  0:57       ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: mm: call ctor for stage2 pmd page Yu Zhao
2019-03-12  2:19         ` [PATCH] KVM: ARM: Remove pgtable page standard functions from stage-2 page tables Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-12  2:40           ` Yu Zhao
2019-03-12 10:37           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-12 11:31             ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-03-12 11:43               ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-03-12 13:25                 ` [PATCH V2] " Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-01 16:16                   ` Will Deacon
2019-04-01 18:34                     ` Yu Zhao
2019-04-02  9:03                       ` Will Deacon
2019-04-08 14:22                         ` Will Deacon
2019-04-08 17:18                           ` Yu Zhao
2019-04-08  9:09                     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-12  0:57       ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: mm: enable per pmd page table lock Yu Zhao
2019-02-19  3:08 ` [PATCH] " Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dfc727b4-0806-4867-2f9c-0bb8fdd459ad@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cpandya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yaojun8558363@gmail.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).