From: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
To: Jiacheng Yu <yujiacheng3@huawei.com>
Cc: samitolvanen@google.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, yosry@kernel.org, nphamcs@gmail.com,
liuyongqiang13@huawei.com, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] params: fix charp corruption on allocation failure
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:46:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfe25916-0f2e-44ed-8f49-d7448a0e28fa@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728085518.3865621-1-yujiacheng3@huawei.com>
On 7/28/26 10:55 AM, Jiacheng Yu wrote:
> param_set_charp() stores charp parameters in allocated memory after slab is
> available, and releases the previous value when the parameter is updated.
>
> The previous value is released before the replacement allocation succeeds.
> If kmalloc_parameter() fails, the setter returns -ENOMEM with the parameter
> left as NULL.
>
> Failing zswap's compressor update before zswap is initialized can later
> trigger:
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
> RIP: 0010:strcmp+0x10/0x30
> Call Trace:
> zswap_setup+0x3b1/0x490
> zswap_enabled_param_set+0x5b/0xa0
> param_attr_store+0x93/0xe0
> module_attr_store+0x1c/0x30
> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x116/0x1f0
>
> Allocate and copy the replacement first, then replace the parameter value
> only after allocation succeeds.
>
> Fixes: e180a6b7759a ("param: fix charp parameters set via sysfs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jiacheng Yu <yujiacheng3@huawei.com>
It makes sense to me for param_set_charp() to have commit-or-rollback
semantics. The set callbacks of other standard parameters behave this
way, with the exception of array parameters.
> ---
> kernel/params.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/params.c b/kernel/params.c
> index a668863a4bb6..e4f2b71dde1e 100644
> --- a/kernel/params.c
> +++ b/kernel/params.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(param_set_uint_minmax);
>
> int param_set_charp(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> {
> + char *tmp;
> size_t len, maxlen = 1024;
>
> len = strnlen(val, maxlen + 1);
> @@ -269,19 +270,20 @@ int param_set_charp(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> return -ENOSPC;
> }
>
> - maybe_kfree_parameter(*(char **)kp->arg);
> -
> /*
> * This is a hack. We can't kmalloc() in early boot, and we
> * don't need to; this mangled commandline is preserved.
> */
> if (slab_is_available()) {
> - *(char **)kp->arg = kmalloc_parameter(len + 1);
> - if (!*(char **)kp->arg)
> + tmp = kmalloc_parameter(len + 1);
> + if (!tmp)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - strcpy(*(char **)kp->arg, val);
> + strscpy(tmp, val, len + 1);
What's wrong with the plain strcpy() here?
> } else
> - *(const char **)kp->arg = val;
> + tmp = (char *)val;
> +
> + maybe_kfree_parameter(*(char **)kp->arg);
> + *(char **)kp->arg = tmp;
Sashiko reports [1] that there is a pre-existing use-after-free window
between freeing the old parameter and updating kp->arg. However, this
issue doesn't appear to be valid because any concurrent access to
a writable charp parameter should be protected by kernel_param_lock().
This is documented include/linux/moduleparam.h [2].
>
> return 0;
> }
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-modules/20260728075803.AA13C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
[2] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v7.2-rc5/include/linux/moduleparam.h#L124
--
Thanks,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 8:55 [PATCH] params: fix charp corruption on allocation failure Jiacheng Yu
2026-07-28 10:46 ` Petr Pavlu [this message]
2026-07-28 12:22 ` Jiacheng Yu
2026-07-28 12:57 ` Petr Pavlu
2026-07-29 11:22 ` Jiacheng Yu
2026-07-29 12:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Jiacheng Yu
2026-07-31 14:21 ` Petr Pavlu
2026-08-06 14:51 ` Petr Pavlu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dfe25916-0f2e-44ed-8f49-d7448a0e28fa@suse.com \
--to=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuyongqiang13@huawei.com \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yosry@kernel.org \
--cc=yujiacheng3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox