From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: jglisse@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Evgeny Baskakov <ebaskakov@nvidia.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] mm/hmm: use uint64_t for HMM pfn instead of defining hmm_pfn_t to ulong
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 20:59:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e20e4e55-c99b-03c2-0bcf-4167d583dcbe@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180316191414.3223-8-jglisse@redhat.com>
On 03/16/2018 12:14 PM, jglisse@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
>
Hi Jerome,
This one looks great. A couple of trivial typo fixes are listed below.
You can add:
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> All device driver we care about are using 64bits page table entry. In
> order to match this and to avoid useless define convert all HMM pfn to
> directly use uint64_t. It is a first step on the road to allow driver
> to directly use pfn value return by HMM (saving memory and CPU cycles
> use for convertion between the two).
used for conversion
>
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: Evgeny Baskakov <ebaskakov@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@nvidia.com>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> ---
> include/linux/hmm.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> mm/hmm.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> @@ -104,14 +100,14 @@ typedef unsigned long hmm_pfn_t;
> #define HMM_PFN_SHIFT 6
>
> /*
> - * hmm_pfn_t_to_page() - return struct page pointed to by a valid hmm_pfn_t
> - * @pfn: hmm_pfn_t to convert to struct page
> - * Returns: struct page pointer if pfn is a valid hmm_pfn_t, NULL otherwise
> + * hmm_pfn_to_page() - return struct page pointed to by a valid HMM pfn
> + * @pfn: HMM pfn value to get corresponding struct page from
> + * Returns: struct page pointer if pfn is a valid HMM pfn, NULL otherwise
> *
> - * If the hmm_pfn_t is valid (ie valid flag set) then return the struct page
> - * matching the pfn value stored in the hmm_pfn_t. Otherwise return NULL.
> + * If the uint64_t is valid (ie valid flag set) then return the struct page
If the HMM pfn is valid
<snip>
>
> @@ -634,8 +634,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_vma_range_done);
> * This is similar to a regular CPU page fault except that it will not trigger
> * any memory migration if the memory being faulted is not accessible by CPUs.
> *
> - * On error, for one virtual address in the range, the function will set the
> - * hmm_pfn_t error flag for the corresponding pfn entry.
> + * On error, for one virtual address in the range, the function will mark the
> + * correspond HMM pfn entry with error flag.
corresponding HMM pfn entry with an error flag.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-17 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-16 19:14 [PATCH 0/4] hmm: fixes and documentations v2 jglisse
2018-03-16 19:14 ` [PATCH 01/14] mm/hmm: documentation editorial update to HMM documentation jglisse
2018-03-16 19:14 ` [PATCH 02/14] mm/hmm: fix header file if/else/endif maze jglisse
2018-03-16 21:09 ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-16 21:18 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-03-16 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-16 21:40 ` John Hubbard
2018-03-17 1:20 ` [PATCH 02/14] mm/hmm: fix header file if/else/endif maze v2 jglisse
2018-03-16 19:14 ` [PATCH 03/14] mm/hmm: HMM should have a callback before MM is destroyed v2 jglisse
2018-03-16 21:12 ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-16 21:26 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-03-16 21:37 ` John Hubbard
2018-03-17 2:36 ` John Hubbard
2018-03-17 3:47 ` John Hubbard
2018-03-17 4:39 ` John Hubbard
2018-03-16 19:14 ` [PATCH 04/14] mm/hmm: hmm_pfns_bad() was accessing wrong struct jglisse
2018-03-17 2:04 ` John Hubbard
2018-03-16 19:14 ` [PATCH 05/14] mm/hmm: use struct for hmm_vma_fault(), hmm_vma_get_pfns() parameters jglisse
2018-03-17 3:08 ` John Hubbard
2018-03-16 19:14 ` [PATCH 06/14] mm/hmm: remove HMM_PFN_READ flag and ignore peculiar architecture jglisse
2018-03-17 3:30 ` John Hubbard
2018-03-16 19:14 ` [PATCH 07/14] mm/hmm: use uint64_t for HMM pfn instead of defining hmm_pfn_t to ulong jglisse
2018-03-17 3:59 ` John Hubbard [this message]
2018-03-16 19:14 ` [PATCH 08/14] mm/hmm: cleanup special vma handling (VM_SPECIAL) jglisse
2018-03-17 4:35 ` John Hubbard
2018-03-16 19:14 ` [PATCH 09/14] mm/hmm: do not differentiate between empty entry or missing directory jglisse
2018-03-19 23:06 ` John Hubbard
2018-03-20 2:08 ` Jerome Glisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e20e4e55-c99b-03c2-0bcf-4167d583dcbe@nvidia.com \
--to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebaskakov@nvidia.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhairgrove@nvidia.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).