From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id v46so84765rnb.14 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:32:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:32:23 +0100 From: "Bart Van Assche" Subject: Re: [Bug 9941] New: Zone "Normal" missing in /proc/zoneinfo In-Reply-To: <20080213143406.GA1328@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080212100623.4fd6cf85.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080212234522.24bed8c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080213115225.GB4007@csn.ul.ie> <20080213143406.GA1328@csn.ul.ie> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Andrew Morton , bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andy Whitcroft List-ID: On Feb 13, 2008 3:34 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > Yes. You should not be seeing a Normal zone unless you have > 4GB of > RAM unless for some really strange reason your physical memory was > placed above the 4GB mark which is possibly but unlikely. Could you post > the dmesg -s 1000000 of 2.6.24 and its .config just in case please? Update: after rebooting into 2.6.24 I get now the same results with 2.6.24 and 2.6.24.2: $ uname -a Linux INF012 2.6.24 #1 SMP Wed Feb 13 16:16:07 CET 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ grep zone /proc/zoneinfo Node 0, zone DMA Node 0, zone DMA32 The output I included in the original bug report was probably from another system with 2.6.24 that is running here, a system with 4 GB memory instead of 2 GB. Sorry for the confusion I created. Bart Van Assche. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org