From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id z25so1142801ele.8 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:59:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:59:30 +0100 From: "Bart Van Assche" Subject: Re: Synchronization of the procps tools with /proc/meminfo In-Reply-To: <787b0d920802191053pea784fdycd3b5119cfb886a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <787b0d920802191053pea784fdycd3b5119cfb886a@mail.gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Albert Cahalan Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman List-ID: On Feb 19, 2008 7:53 PM, Albert Cahalan wrote: > On Feb 18, 2008 10:55 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > > This leads me to the question: if the layout of /proc/meminfo changes, > > who communicates these changes to the procps maintainers ? > > Nobody ever informs me. :-( That's very unfortunate. But how should we proceed ? There is not only the SReclaimable field that was added to /proc/meminfo, there is also the NFS_Unstable field. I'm not sure whether that last one counts as reclaimable. Note: Mel Gorman, who's also in CC, is on holiday but will jump in on this discussion as soon as he's back from holiday. Bart Van Assche. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org