From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id z25so341382ele.8 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:06:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:06:28 +0100 From: "Bart Van Assche" Subject: Re: SMP-related kernel memory leak In-Reply-To: <6101e8c40802210821w626bc831uaf4c3f66fb097094@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6101e8c40802191018t668faf3avba9beeff34f7f853@mail.gmail.com> <6101e8c40802201342y7e792e70lbd398f84a58a38bd@mail.gmail.com> <6101e8c40802210821w626bc831uaf4c3f66fb097094@mail.gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Oliver Pinter Cc: Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org, Peter Zijlstra List-ID: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote: > it is reproductable with SLUB? > /* sorry for the bad english, but i not learned it .. */ The behavior with SLUB is similar but slightly different than the SLAB behavior: with SLUB I see that memory usage increases faster and the upper limit is a little bit lower. I will add the updated graph to the bugzilla entry. Bart Van Assche. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org