From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: memory_hotplug: check hwpoisoned page firstly in do_migrate_range()
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:46:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e399ec02-41e3-4374-836f-033bdce42d6d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240817084941.2375713-4-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
On 17.08.24 10:49, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> The commit b15c87263a69 ("hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned
> pages to be offlined") don't handle the hugetlb pages, the endless
> loop still occur if offline a hwpoison hugetlb, luckly, with the
> commit e591ef7d96d6 ("mm,hwpoison,hugetlb,memory_hotplug: hotremove
> memory section with hwpoisoned hugepage") section with hwpoisoned
> hugepage"), the HPageMigratable of hugetlb page will be clear, and
> the hwpoison hugetlb page will be skipped in scan_movable_pages(),
> so the endless loop issue is fixed.
>
> However if the HPageMigratable() check passed(without reference and
> lock), the hugetlb page may be hwpoisoned, it won't cause issue since
> the hwpoisoned page will be handled correctly in the next movable
> pages scan loop, and it will be isolated in do_migrate_range() but
> fails to migrate. In order to avoid the unnecessary isolation and
> unify all hwpoisoned page handling, let's unconditionally check hwpoison
> firstly, and if it is a hwpoisoned hugetlb page, try to unmap it as
> the catch all safety net like normal page does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index dc19b0e28fbc..02a0d4fbc3fe 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1793,13 +1793,8 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> * but out loop could handle that as it revisits the split
> * folio later.
> */
> - if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> + if (folio_test_large(folio))
> pfn = folio_pfn(folio) + folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
> - if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
> - isolate_hugetlb(folio, &source);
> - continue;
> - }
> - }
>
> /*
> * HWPoison pages have elevated reference counts so the migration would
> @@ -1808,11 +1803,17 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> * (e.g. current hwpoison implementation doesn't unmap KSM pages but keep
> * the unmap as the catch all safety net).
> */
> - if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
> + if (folio_test_hwpoison(folio) ||
> + (folio_test_large(folio) && folio_test_has_hwpoisoned(folio))) {
We have the exact same check already in mm/shmem.c now.
Likely this should be factored out ... but no idea what function name we
should use that won't add even more confusion :D
> if (WARN_ON(folio_test_lru(folio)))
> folio_isolate_lru(folio);
> if (folio_mapped(folio))
> - try_to_unmap(folio, TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK);
> + unmap_posioned_folio(folio, TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
> + isolate_hugetlb(folio, &source);
> continue;
> }
>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-26 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-17 8:49 [PATCH resend v2 0/5] mm: memory_hotplug: improve do_migrate_range() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-17 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: memory_hotplug: remove head variable in do_migrate_range() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-19 9:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-19 10:41 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-21 7:33 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-08-26 14:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-17 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm: memory-failure: add unmap_posioned_folio() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-21 7:40 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-08-21 8:54 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-17 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: memory_hotplug: check hwpoisoned page firstly in do_migrate_range() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-22 6:52 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-08-22 11:35 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-26 14:46 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-08-27 1:13 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-27 2:12 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-08-27 15:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-17 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm: migrate: add isolate_folio_to_list() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-20 9:32 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-08-20 9:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-21 2:00 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-08-21 2:14 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-22 6:56 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-08-26 14:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-27 1:19 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-17 8:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm: memory_hotplug: unify Huge/LRU/non-LRU movable folio isolation Kefeng Wang
2024-08-22 7:20 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-08-22 12:08 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-26 14:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-27 1:26 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-27 15:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-27 15:35 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-27 15:38 ` David Hildenbrand
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-16 9:04 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: memory_hotplug: improve do_migrate_range() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-16 9:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: memory_hotplug: check hwpoisoned page firstly in do_migrate_range() Kefeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e399ec02-41e3-4374-836f-033bdce42d6d@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).