From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f69.google.com (mail-pg0-f69.google.com [74.125.83.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCF86B0005 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:17:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f69.google.com with SMTP id n5so13386523pgq.3 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com. [192.55.52.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e1-v6si6770754pln.445.2018.04.26.11.17.06 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] x86, pkeys: override pkey when moving away from PROT_EXEC References: <20180326172721.D5B2CBB4@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20180326172727.025EBF16@viggo.jf.intel.com> From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:17:05 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner , Shakeel Butt Cc: Dave Hansen , LKML , Linux MM , stable@kernel.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , shuah@kernel.org On 04/26/2018 01:55 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> Hi Dave, are you planning to send the next version of this patch or >> going with this one? > Right, some enlightment would be appreciated. I'm lost in the dozen > different threads discussing this back and forth. Shakeel, thanks for the reminder! I'll send an updated set. I got lost myself and thought this had been picked up. There were a few minor comments on the [v2] set that I've addressed. I'll also check with Ram to make sure he's OK with this on ppc. We had some dueling patches at some point.