* [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: leave lazy MMU mode on PTE mapping error
@ 2025-06-23 7:57 Alexander Gordeev
2025-06-23 12:37 ` Ryan Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Gordeev @ 2025-06-23 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter, Ryan Roberts, Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel
Function vmap_pages_pte_range() enters the lazy MMU mode,
but fails to leave it in case an error is encountered.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202506132017.T1l1l6ME-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: 44562c71e2cf ("mm/vmalloc: Enter lazy mmu mode while manipulating vmalloc ptes")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index ab986dd09b6a..6dbcdceecae1 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ static int vmap_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long end, pgprot_t prot, struct page **pages, int *nr,
pgtbl_mod_mask *mask)
{
+ int err = 0;
pte_t *pte;
/*
@@ -530,12 +531,18 @@ static int vmap_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
do {
struct page *page = pages[*nr];
- if (WARN_ON(!pte_none(ptep_get(pte))))
- return -EBUSY;
- if (WARN_ON(!page))
- return -ENOMEM;
- if (WARN_ON(!pfn_valid(page_to_pfn(page))))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (WARN_ON(!pte_none(ptep_get(pte)))) {
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (WARN_ON(!page)) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (WARN_ON(!pfn_valid(page_to_pfn(page)))) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, pte, mk_pte(page, prot));
(*nr)++;
@@ -543,7 +550,8 @@ static int vmap_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
*mask |= PGTBL_PTE_MODIFIED;
- return 0;
+
+ return err;
}
static int vmap_pages_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: leave lazy MMU mode on PTE mapping error
2025-06-23 7:57 [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: leave lazy MMU mode on PTE mapping error Alexander Gordeev
@ 2025-06-23 12:37 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-23 13:03 ` Alexander Gordeev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Roberts @ 2025-06-23 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Gordeev, Dan Carpenter, Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 23/06/2025 08:57, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Function vmap_pages_pte_range() enters the lazy MMU mode,
> but fails to leave it in case an error is encountered.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202506132017.T1l1l6ME-lkp@intel.com/
> Fixes: 44562c71e2cf ("mm/vmalloc: Enter lazy mmu mode while manipulating vmalloc ptes")
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Ouch, sorry about that! The patch looks good to me so:
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
I wonder an aditional Fixes: should be added for Commit 2ba3e6947aed
("mm/vmalloc: track which page-table levels were modified") though? That's the
one that added the "*mask |= PGTBL_PTE_MODIFIED;" which would have also been
skipped if an error occured before this patch.
Thanks,
Ryan
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index ab986dd09b6a..6dbcdceecae1 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ static int vmap_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> unsigned long end, pgprot_t prot, struct page **pages, int *nr,
> pgtbl_mod_mask *mask)
> {
> + int err = 0;
> pte_t *pte;
>
> /*
> @@ -530,12 +531,18 @@ static int vmap_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> do {
> struct page *page = pages[*nr];
>
> - if (WARN_ON(!pte_none(ptep_get(pte))))
> - return -EBUSY;
> - if (WARN_ON(!page))
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - if (WARN_ON(!pfn_valid(page_to_pfn(page))))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (WARN_ON(!pte_none(ptep_get(pte)))) {
> + err = -EBUSY;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (WARN_ON(!page)) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (WARN_ON(!pfn_valid(page_to_pfn(page)))) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
>
> set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, pte, mk_pte(page, prot));
> (*nr)++;
> @@ -543,7 +550,8 @@ static int vmap_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>
> arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
> *mask |= PGTBL_PTE_MODIFIED;
> - return 0;
> +
> + return err;
> }
>
> static int vmap_pages_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: leave lazy MMU mode on PTE mapping error
2025-06-23 12:37 ` Ryan Roberts
@ 2025-06-23 13:03 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-06-23 13:31 ` Ryan Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Gordeev @ 2025-06-23 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ryan Roberts; +Cc: Dan Carpenter, Andrew Morton, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 01:37:11PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 23/06/2025 08:57, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > Function vmap_pages_pte_range() enters the lazy MMU mode,
> > but fails to leave it in case an error is encountered.
> >
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202506132017.T1l1l6ME-lkp@intel.com/
> > Fixes: 44562c71e2cf ("mm/vmalloc: Enter lazy mmu mode while manipulating vmalloc ptes")
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Ouch, sorry about that! The patch looks good to me so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>
> I wonder an aditional Fixes: should be added for Commit 2ba3e6947aed
> ("mm/vmalloc: track which page-table levels were modified") though? That's the
> one that added the "*mask |= PGTBL_PTE_MODIFIED;" which would have also been
> skipped if an error occured before this patch.
Good catch! I think it certainly needs to be reported with Fixes
and I even doubt whether your commit should be mentioned at all?
> Thanks,
> Ryan
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: leave lazy MMU mode on PTE mapping error
2025-06-23 13:03 ` Alexander Gordeev
@ 2025-06-23 13:31 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-23 13:53 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Roberts @ 2025-06-23 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Gordeev; +Cc: Dan Carpenter, Andrew Morton, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 23/06/2025 14:03, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 01:37:11PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> On 23/06/2025 08:57, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
>>> Function vmap_pages_pte_range() enters the lazy MMU mode,
>>> but fails to leave it in case an error is encountered.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202506132017.T1l1l6ME-lkp@intel.com/
>>> Fixes: 44562c71e2cf ("mm/vmalloc: Enter lazy mmu mode while manipulating vmalloc ptes")
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Ouch, sorry about that! The patch looks good to me so:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>>
>> I wonder an aditional Fixes: should be added for Commit 2ba3e6947aed
>> ("mm/vmalloc: track which page-table levels were modified") though? That's the
>> one that added the "*mask |= PGTBL_PTE_MODIFIED;" which would have also been
>> skipped if an error occured before this patch.
>
> Good catch! I think it certainly needs to be reported with Fixes
> and I even doubt whether your commit should be mentioned at all?
Well I would certainly argue that my patch is broken as is. So happy to have 2
Fixes: tags. But I'm not really sure what the rules are here...
>
>> Thanks,
>> Ryan
>
> Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: leave lazy MMU mode on PTE mapping error
2025-06-23 13:31 ` Ryan Roberts
@ 2025-06-23 13:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-06-23 14:30 ` Ryan Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2025-06-23 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ryan Roberts; +Cc: Alexander Gordeev, Andrew Morton, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 02:31:48PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 23/06/2025 14:03, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 01:37:11PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> >> On 23/06/2025 08:57, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> >>> Function vmap_pages_pte_range() enters the lazy MMU mode,
> >>> but fails to leave it in case an error is encountered.
> >>>
> >>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> >>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202506132017.T1l1l6ME-lkp@intel.com/
> >>> Fixes: 44562c71e2cf ("mm/vmalloc: Enter lazy mmu mode while manipulating vmalloc ptes")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
> >>
> >> Ouch, sorry about that! The patch looks good to me so:
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> >>
> >> I wonder an aditional Fixes: should be added for Commit 2ba3e6947aed
> >> ("mm/vmalloc: track which page-table levels were modified") though? That's the
> >> one that added the "*mask |= PGTBL_PTE_MODIFIED;" which would have also been
> >> skipped if an error occured before this patch.
> >
> > Good catch! I think it certainly needs to be reported with Fixes
> > and I even doubt whether your commit should be mentioned at all?
>
> Well I would certainly argue that my patch is broken as is. So happy to have 2
> Fixes: tags. But I'm not really sure what the rules are here...
I would only list the older commit 2ba3e6947aed ("mm/vmalloc: track
which page-table levels were modified"). The static checker warning
came later, but it's not really the important bit. It's just one bug.
We'll have to hand edit the commit if we want to backport it so that's
a separate issue.
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: leave lazy MMU mode on PTE mapping error
2025-06-23 13:53 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2025-06-23 14:30 ` Ryan Roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Roberts @ 2025-06-23 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: Alexander Gordeev, Andrew Morton, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 23/06/2025 14:53, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 02:31:48PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> On 23/06/2025 14:03, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 01:37:11PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>>> On 23/06/2025 08:57, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
>>>>> Function vmap_pages_pte_range() enters the lazy MMU mode,
>>>>> but fails to leave it in case an error is encountered.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>>>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
>>>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202506132017.T1l1l6ME-lkp@intel.com/
>>>>> Fixes: 44562c71e2cf ("mm/vmalloc: Enter lazy mmu mode while manipulating vmalloc ptes")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> Ouch, sorry about that! The patch looks good to me so:
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>>>>
>>>> I wonder an aditional Fixes: should be added for Commit 2ba3e6947aed
>>>> ("mm/vmalloc: track which page-table levels were modified") though? That's the
>>>> one that added the "*mask |= PGTBL_PTE_MODIFIED;" which would have also been
>>>> skipped if an error occured before this patch.
>>>
>>> Good catch! I think it certainly needs to be reported with Fixes
>>> and I even doubt whether your commit should be mentioned at all?
>>
>> Well I would certainly argue that my patch is broken as is. So happy to have 2
>> Fixes: tags. But I'm not really sure what the rules are here...
>
> I would only list the older commit 2ba3e6947aed ("mm/vmalloc: track
> which page-table levels were modified"). The static checker warning
> came later, but it's not really the important bit. It's just one bug.
Given smatch caught the locking bug, I wonder if it could be taught to look for
lazy_mmu issues? i.e. unbalanced enter/leave, nesting and read hazards. I think
Alexander previously found a read hazard so I wouldn't be surprised if there are
more.
>
> We'll have to hand edit the commit if we want to backport it so that's
> a separate issue.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-23 14:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-23 7:57 [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: leave lazy MMU mode on PTE mapping error Alexander Gordeev
2025-06-23 12:37 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-23 13:03 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-06-23 13:31 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-23 13:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-06-23 14:30 ` Ryan Roberts
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).