Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
To: XIAO WU <xiaowu.417@qq.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
	Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v3 7/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock()
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 14:28:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e54ce8be-9480-4583-9c6a-d0dbe1378f53@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_45CAE878B5922990DB102BE05A1BAD50DA09@qq.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3544 bytes --]



On 6/21/26 9:29 AM, XIAO WU wrote:
> Hi,

Hi Xiao,

> I noticed the Sashiko AI review [1] in this thread flagged that
> kfree_call_rcu_nolock() dereferences slab->slab_cache even when
> virt_to_slab() returns NULL (for large kmalloc objects that bypass
> SLUB, or vmalloc addresses).  The VM_WARN_ON_ONCE fires but does not
> stop execution, and the subsequent NULL dereference is deterministic.

Thanks for taking a look, but this was intentional.

I should have documented that only kmalloc_nolock() ->
kfree_rcu_nolock() is allowed and kmalloc() -> kfree_rcu_nolock()
is not allowed (yet).

> I was able to reproduce this in QEMU with KASAN.  The trigger is as
> simple as passing a large (>8KB) kmalloc buffer to the new function.
> 
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 12:06:14AM +0800, Harry Yoo (Oracle) wrote:
>> This commit introduces kfree_rcu_nolock(), a variant of kfree_rcu()
>> designed to be safely called from unknown contexts without falling
>> back to batched processing.
> ...
>> +void kfree_call_rcu_nolock(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
>> +{
>> +    struct slab *slab;
>> +    struct kmem_cache *s;
>> +
>> +    VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(is_vmalloc_addr(ptr) || !virt_to_slab(ptr));
>> +
>> +    slab = virt_to_slab(ptr);
>> +    s = slab->slab_cache;
> 
> The problem: if ptr is a large kmalloc object (> KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE,
> which is 8 KB on x86_64), the allocation bypasses SLUB and comes from
> the page allocator.  virt_to_slab() returns NULL.  VM_WARN_ON_ONCE
> prints a warning but does NOT return, and the next line dereferences
> NULL->slab_cache at offset 0x8.

Since kmalloc_nolock() does not support large kmalloc, the warning
is not supposed to trigger. That is why I added only debug warnings.

> [Reproduction]
> 
> I rebuilt the kernel with CONFIG_KASAN=y and added a small late_initcall
> that allocates a 16 KB buffer and passes it to kfree_call_rcu_nolock():
> 
>   static int __init kfree_rcu_nolock_poc_trigger(void)
>   {
>       void *p = kmalloc(16384, GFP_KERNEL);
>       struct rcu_head *head = kmalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL);
>       kfree_call_rcu_nolock(head, p);

As mentioned ealier, kmalloc() -> kfree_rcu_nolock() is not supported.

-- 
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon

>       return 0;
>   }
>   late_initcall(kfree_rcu_nolock_poc_trigger);
> 
> [Crash log — kernel 6.19.0-rc5, CONFIG_KASAN=y, CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=y]
> 
>   kfree_rcu_nolock PoC: calling kfree_call_rcu_nolock on large obj
> ffff888026c5c000
> 
>   WARNING: mm/slab_common.c:1271 at kfree_call_rcu_nolock+0x1e/0xc0
>   VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(is_vmalloc_addr(ptr) || !virt_to_slab(ptr))
> 
>   BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
>   #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>   #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> 
>   RIP: 0010:kfree_call_rcu_nolock+0x5c/0xc0
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    poc_trigger_init+0x2a/0x40
>    do_one_initcall+0x131/0x730
>    kernel_init_freeable+0x471/0x7e0
>    kernel_init+0x28/0x300
>    ret_from_fork+0x2c/0xc0
>    </TASK>
> 
>   Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
> 
> The crash is at offset 0x5c inside kfree_call_rcu_nolock(), which
> corresponds to `s = slab->slab_cache`.  The fault address 0x8 is
> exactly offsetof(struct slab, slab_cache).
> 
> [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260615-kfree_rcu_nolock-
> v3-0-70a54f3775bb%40kernel.org
>     (Sashiko AI code review — "Null Pointer Dereference", Severity:
> Critical)
> 
> Thanks,
> XIAO

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-22  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-15 11:05 [PATCH for-next v3 0/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 1/9] slub_kunit: fall back to SW perf events when HW PMU is not available Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 2/9] mm/slab, slub_kunit: register kprobe to trigger _nolock APIs Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-24 13:41   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 3/9] mm/slab: handle the !allow_spin case in kfree_rcu_sheaf() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
     [not found]   ` <4d7ebcd5-f3b7-4c73-94f1-b7d3ac12a521@kernel.org>
2026-06-17  5:32     ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-17  5:58       ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-24 14:28   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 4/9] mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-24 14:30   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-15 11:05 ` [PATCH for-next v3 5/9] mm/slab: extend deferred free mechanism to handle rcu sheaves Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-24 14:37   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 6/9] mm/slab: allow kfree_rcu_sheaf() on PREEMPT_RT Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-16 17:24   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-17  5:14     ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-17  5:38       ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-17 20:40         ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-06-18 12:46           ` Harry Yoo
2026-06-18 16:26             ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 7/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-16 17:28   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-21  0:29   ` XIAO WU
2026-06-22  5:28     ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2026-06-22 14:56       ` XIAO WU
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 8/9] mm/slab: introduce struct kfree_rcu_head and use in kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-16 17:36   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-15 11:06 ` [PATCH for-next v3 9/9] slub_kunit: extend the test for kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-06-16 17:38   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-15 11:43 ` [PATCH for-next v3 0/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-24  9:22 [PATCH for-next v3 7/9] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() hu.shengming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e54ce8be-9480-4583-9c6a-d0dbe1378f53@kernel.org \
    --to=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaowu.417@qq.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox