Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests/cgroup: fix missing TAP output in test_hugetlb_memcg

[Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>]

在 2026/7/14 10:15, Song Hu 写道:
> main() in test_hugetlb_memcg never calls ksft_print_header(),
> ksft_set_plan(), or ksft_finished(), so its output has no TAP plan and is
> not valid TAP, unlike the sibling test_memcontrol and test_kmem tests.
> Add the header/plan/finished calls following the same pattern.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Song Hu <husong@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_hugetlb_memcg.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_hugetlb_memcg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_hugetlb_memcg.c
> index b627d84358b1..8c5aced813b6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_hugetlb_memcg.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_hugetlb_memcg.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,10 @@ static int test_hugetlb_memcg(char *root)
>  int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  {
>  	char root[PATH_MAX];
> -	int ret = EXIT_SUCCESS, has_memory_hugetlb_acc;
> +	int has_memory_hugetlb_acc;
> +
> +	ksft_print_header();
> +	ksft_set_plan(1);
>  
>  	has_memory_hugetlb_acc = proc_mount_contains("memory_hugetlb_accounting");
>  	if (has_memory_hugetlb_acc < 0)
> @@ -211,7 +214,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  	if (get_hugepage_size() != 2048) {
>  		ksft_print_msg("test_hugetlb_memcg requires 2MB hugepages\n");
>  		ksft_test_result_skip("test_hugetlb_memcg\n");
> -		return ret;
> +		ksft_finished();
>  	}
>  
>  	if (cg_find_unified_root(root, sizeof(root), NULL))
> @@ -233,10 +236,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		ksft_test_result_skip("test_hugetlb_memcg\n");
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		ret = EXIT_FAILURE;
>  		ksft_test_result_fail("test_hugetlb_memcg\n");
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	ksft_finished();
>  }

This one looks good to me — it mirrors the test_memcontrol/test_kmem
pattern and the exit-code semantics are preserved.

Reviewed-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>