From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Wenwei Tao <wenwei.tww@alibaba-inc.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/swap: Remove lock_initialized flag from swap_slots_cache
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 09:54:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6445164-ab4b-86cc-731f-5f6509a7449d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878tjeh96m.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
On 07/23/2017 07:15 PM, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Tim,
>
> Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> writes:
>
>> We will only reach the lock initialization code
>> in alloc_swap_slot_cache when the cpu's swap_slots_cache's slots
>> have not been allocated and swap_slots_cache has not been initialized
>> previously. So the lock_initialized check is redundant and unnecessary.
>> Remove lock_initialized flag from swap_slots_cache to save memory.
>
> Is there a race condition with CPU offline/online when preempt is enabled?
>
> CPU A CPU B
> ----- -----
> get_swap_page()
> get cache[B], cache[B]->slots != NULL
> preempted and moved to CPU A
> be offlined
> be onlined
> alloc_swap_slot_cache()
> mutex_lock(cache[B]->alloc_lock)
> mutex_init(cache[B]->alloc_lock) !!!
>
> The cache[B]->alloc_lock will be reinitialized when it is still held.
Looks like for this case the lock_initialized flag is still needed
to prevent such races and prevent re-initialization of taken locks.
Okay, let's scrap patch 2.
Thanks.
Tim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-24 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-21 22:45 [PATCH 1/2] mm/swap: Fix race conditions in swap_slots cache init Tim Chen
2017-07-21 22:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/swap: Remove lock_initialized flag from swap_slots_cache Tim Chen
2017-07-24 2:15 ` Huang, Ying
2017-07-24 16:54 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2017-10-03 22:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/swap: Fix race conditions in swap_slots cache init Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6445164-ab4b-86cc-731f-5f6509a7449d@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=wenwei.tww@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).