From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/7] powerpc/mm: Enable ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 12:53:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e860f404-af69-aebc-c5eb-8822a585e653@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220407103251.1209606-3-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Le 07/04/2022 à 12:32, Anshuman Khandual a écrit :
> This defines and exports a platform specific custom vm_get_page_prot() via
> subscribing ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT. While here, this also localizes
> arch_vm_get_page_prot() as powerpc_vm_get_page_prot() and moves it near
> vm_get_page_prot().
>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/mman.h | 12 ------------
> arch/powerpc/mm/mmap.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 174edabb74fa..eb9b6ddbf92f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ config PPC
> select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
> select ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_FLUSHCACHE
> select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL
> + select ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT
> select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
> select ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
> select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_PARPORT
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mman.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mman.h
> index 7cb6d18f5cd6..1b024e64c8ec 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mman.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mman.h
> @@ -24,18 +24,6 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(unsigned long prot,
> }
> #define arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey) arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey)
>
> -static inline pgprot_t arch_vm_get_page_prot(unsigned long vm_flags)
> -{
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MEM_KEYS
> - return (vm_flags & VM_SAO) ?
> - __pgprot(_PAGE_SAO | vmflag_to_pte_pkey_bits(vm_flags)) :
> - __pgprot(0 | vmflag_to_pte_pkey_bits(vm_flags));
> -#else
> - return (vm_flags & VM_SAO) ? __pgprot(_PAGE_SAO) : __pgprot(0);
> -#endif
> -}
> -#define arch_vm_get_page_prot(vm_flags) arch_vm_get_page_prot(vm_flags)
> -
> static inline bool arch_validate_prot(unsigned long prot, unsigned long addr)
> {
> if (prot & ~(PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC | PROT_SEM | PROT_SAO))
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmap.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmap.c
> index c475cf810aa8..cd17bd6fa36b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -254,3 +254,29 @@ void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
> mm->get_unmapped_area = arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown;
> }
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> +static pgprot_t powerpc_vm_get_page_prot(unsigned long vm_flags)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MEM_KEYS
> + return (vm_flags & VM_SAO) ?
> + __pgprot(_PAGE_SAO | vmflag_to_pte_pkey_bits(vm_flags)) :
> + __pgprot(0 | vmflag_to_pte_pkey_bits(vm_flags));
> +#else
> + return (vm_flags & VM_SAO) ? __pgprot(_PAGE_SAO) : __pgprot(0);
> +#endif
> +}
> +#else
> +static pgprot_t powerpc_vm_get_page_prot(unsigned long vm_flags)
> +{
> + return __pgprot(0);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
Can we reduce this forest of #ifdefs and make it more readable ?
mm/mmap.c is going away with patch
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/d6d849621f821af253e777a24eda4c648814a76e.1646847562.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/
So it would be better to add two versions of vm_get_page_prot(), for
instance one in mm/pgtable_64.c and one in mm/pgtable_32.c
> +
> +pgprot_t vm_get_page_prot(unsigned long vm_flags)
> +{
> + return __pgprot(pgprot_val(protection_map[vm_flags &
> + (VM_READ|VM_WRITE|VM_EXEC|VM_SHARED)]) |
> + pgprot_val(powerpc_vm_get_page_prot(vm_flags)));
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_get_page_prot);
By the way I'm a bit puzzled with the name powerpc_vm_get_page_prot(),
the name suggests that it's just a powerpc replacement of
vm_get_page_prot(). I'd prefer if it was named __vm_get_page_prot(), it
would be clearer that it is a complement to vm_get_page_prot() and not a
remplacement.
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-08 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-07 10:32 [PATCH V4 0/7] mm/mmap: Drop arch_vm_get_page_prot() and arch_filter_pgprot() Anshuman Khandual
2022-04-07 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 1/7] mm/mmap: Add new config ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT Anshuman Khandual
2022-04-08 9:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-04-07 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 2/7] powerpc/mm: Enable ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT Anshuman Khandual
2022-04-08 12:53 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2022-04-09 11:36 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-04-11 5:31 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-04-11 5:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-04-07 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 3/7] arm64/mm: " Anshuman Khandual
2022-04-08 10:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-04-08 11:19 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-04-07 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 4/7] sparc/mm: " Anshuman Khandual
2022-04-07 15:22 ` Khalid Aziz
2022-04-07 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 5/7] x86/mm: " Anshuman Khandual
2022-04-07 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 6/7] mm/mmap: Drop arch_filter_pgprot() Anshuman Khandual
2022-04-08 10:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-04-07 10:32 ` [PATCH V4 7/7] mm/mmap: Drop arch_vm_get_page_pgprot() Anshuman Khandual
2022-04-08 10:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-04-07 23:20 ` [PATCH V4 0/7] mm/mmap: Drop arch_vm_get_page_prot() and arch_filter_pgprot() Andrew Morton
2022-04-08 2:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e860f404-af69-aebc-c5eb-8822a585e653@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).