Re: [PATCH] mm/vma: refactor vma_modify_flags_name() to vma_modify_name()

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 14.07.25 15:58, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> The single instance in which we use this function doesn't actually need to
> change VMA flags, so remove this parameter and update the caller
> accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> ---
>   mm/madvise.c |  4 ++--
>   mm/vma.c     |  4 +---
>   mm/vma.h     | 15 +++++++--------
>   3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 9de9b7c797c6..afa9e4db2adb 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -162,8 +162,8 @@ static int madvise_update_vma(vm_flags_t new_flags,
>   		return 0;
>   
>   	if (set_new_anon_name)
> -		vma = vma_modify_flags_name(&vmi, madv_behavior->prev, vma,
> -			range->start, range->end, new_flags, anon_name);
> +		vma = vma_modify_name(&vmi, madv_behavior->prev, vma,
> +			range->start, range->end, anon_name);
>   	else

The doc of madvise_update_vma() is a bit misleading:

"Update the vm_flags and/or anon_name"

I assume it's xor? Do we want to sanity check that this will hold true?

In general, LGTM.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb