From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: chrisl@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, ioworker0@gmail.com,
kasong@tencent.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
v-songbaohua@oppo.com, x86@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
zhengtangquan@oppo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] mm: Avoid splitting pmd for lazyfree pmd-mapped THP in try_to_unmap
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:30:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef266df5-46dc-43d2-8bb3-df28223b7149@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250115033808.40641-5-21cnbao@gmail.com>
On 2025/1/15 11:38, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
>
> The try_to_unmap_one() function currently handles PMD-mapped THPs
> inefficiently. It first splits the PMD into PTEs, copies the dirty
> state from the PMD to the PTEs, iterates over the PTEs to locate
> the dirty state, and then marks the THP as swap-backed. This process
> involves unnecessary PMD splitting and redundant iteration. Instead,
> this functionality can be efficiently managed in
> __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(), avoiding the extra steps and
> improving performance.
>
> The following microbenchmark redirties folios after invoking MADV_FREE,
> then measures the time taken to perform memory reclamation (actually
> set those folios swapbacked again) on the redirtied folios.
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <time.h>
>
> #define SIZE 128*1024*1024 // 128 MB
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> while(1) {
> volatile int *p = mmap(0, SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
>
> memset((void *)p, 1, SIZE);
> madvise((void *)p, SIZE, MADV_FREE);
> /* redirty after MADV_FREE */
> memset((void *)p, 1, SIZE);
>
> clock_t start_time = clock();
> madvise((void *)p, SIZE, MADV_PAGEOUT);
> clock_t end_time = clock();
>
> double elapsed_time = (double)(end_time - start_time) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
> printf("Time taken by reclamation: %f seconds\n", elapsed_time);
>
> munmap((void *)p, SIZE);
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> Testing results are as below,
> w/o patch:
> ~ # ./a.out
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007300 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007226 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007295 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007731 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007134 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007285 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007720 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007128 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007710 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007712 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007236 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007690 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007174 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007670 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007169 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007305 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007432 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007158 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007133 seconds
> …
>
> w/ patch
>
> ~ # ./a.out
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002124 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002116 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002150 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002261 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002137 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002173 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002063 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002088 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002169 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002124 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002111 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002224 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002297 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002260 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002246 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002272 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002277 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002462 seconds
Good result.
> This patch significantly speeds up try_to_unmap_one() by allowing it
> to skip redirtied THPs without splitting the PMD.
>
> Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Suggested-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-17 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-15 3:38 [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: batched unmap lazyfree large folios during reclamation Barry Song
2025-01-15 3:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: Set folio swapbacked iff folios are dirty in try_to_unmap_one Barry Song
2025-01-15 3:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: Support tlbbatch flush for a range of PTEs Barry Song
2025-01-16 8:30 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-01-15 3:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: Support batched unmap for lazyfree large folios during reclamation Barry Song
2025-02-04 11:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-05 2:55 ` Andrew Morton
2025-02-05 3:35 ` Barry Song
2025-01-15 3:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm: Avoid splitting pmd for lazyfree pmd-mapped THP in try_to_unmap Barry Song
2025-01-15 5:01 ` Lance Yang
2025-01-15 5:09 ` Barry Song
2025-01-15 5:41 ` Lance Yang
2025-01-15 6:26 ` Lance Yang
2025-01-15 6:42 ` Barry Song
2025-01-15 7:01 ` Lance Yang
2025-01-17 1:30 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2025-01-18 14:00 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef266df5-46dc-43d2-8bb3-df28223b7149@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox