linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm: hugetlb: convert to prep_account_new_hugetlb_folio()
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 11:54:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <efa76c67-c85e-46e3-9a7b-e4c1cf457aa7@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250802073107.2787975-3-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

On 8/2/25 3:31 AM, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> In order to avoid the wrong nid passed into the account, it's better
> to move folio_nid() into prep_account_new_hugetlb_folio().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>

> ---
>   mm/hugetlb.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 5b4c19e7a5f7..afec5a6a8aca 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1890,11 +1890,11 @@ void free_huge_folio(struct folio *folio)
>   /*
>    * Must be called with the hugetlb lock held
>    */
> -static void __prep_account_new_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> +static void prep_account_new_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h, struct folio *folio)
>   {
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock);
>   	h->nr_huge_pages++;
> -	h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
> +	h->nr_huge_pages_node[folio_nid(folio)]++;
>   }
>   
>   static void init_new_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h, struct folio *folio)
> @@ -2020,7 +2020,7 @@ static void prep_and_add_allocated_folios(struct hstate *h,
>   	/* Add all new pool pages to free lists in one lock cycle */
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&hugetlb_lock, flags);
>   	list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, tmp_f, folio_list, lru) {
> -		__prep_account_new_huge_page(h, folio_nid(folio));
> +		prep_account_new_hugetlb_folio(h, folio);
>   		enqueue_hugetlb_folio(h, folio);
>   	}
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hugetlb_lock, flags);
> @@ -2232,7 +2232,7 @@ static struct folio *alloc_surplus_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h,
>   	 * as surplus_pages, otherwise it might confuse
>   	 * persistent_huge_pages() momentarily.
>   	 */
> -	__prep_account_new_huge_page(h, folio_nid(folio));
> +	prep_account_new_hugetlb_folio(h, folio);
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * We could have raced with the pool size change.
> @@ -2270,7 +2270,7 @@ static struct folio *alloc_migrate_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mas
>   		return NULL;
>   
>   	spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> -	__prep_account_new_huge_page(h, folio_nid(folio));
> +	prep_account_new_hugetlb_folio(h, folio);
>   	spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>   
>   	/* fresh huge pages are frozen */
> @@ -2829,7 +2829,7 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_hugetlb_folio(struct folio *old_folio,
>   		/*
>   		 * Ok, old_folio is still a genuine free hugepage. Remove it from
>   		 * the freelist and decrease the counters. These will be
> -		 * incremented again when calling __prep_account_new_huge_page()
> +		 * incremented again when calling prep_account_new_hugetlb_folio()
>   		 * and enqueue_hugetlb_folio() for new_folio. The counters will
>   		 * remain stable since this happens under the lock.
>   		 */
> @@ -2839,7 +2839,7 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_hugetlb_folio(struct folio *old_folio,
>   		 * Ref count on new_folio is already zero as it was dropped
>   		 * earlier.  It can be directly added to the pool free list.
>   		 */
> -		__prep_account_new_huge_page(h, nid);
> +		prep_account_new_hugetlb_folio(h, new_folio);
>   		enqueue_hugetlb_folio(h, new_folio);
>   
>   		/*
> @@ -3309,7 +3309,7 @@ static void __init prep_and_add_bootmem_folios(struct hstate *h,
>   		hugetlb_bootmem_init_migratetype(folio, h);
>   		/* Subdivide locks to achieve better parallel performance */
>   		spin_lock_irqsave(&hugetlb_lock, flags);
> -		__prep_account_new_huge_page(h, folio_nid(folio));
> +		prep_account_new_hugetlb_folio(h, folio);
>   		enqueue_hugetlb_folio(h, folio);
>   		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hugetlb_lock, flags);
>   	}



  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-04 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-02  7:31 [PATCH 0/7] mm: hugetlb: cleanup and allocate frozen hugetlb folio Kefeng Wang
2025-08-02  7:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: hugetlb: convert to alloc_fresh_hugetlb_hvo_folio() Kefeng Wang
2025-08-04 15:41   ` Sidhartha Kumar
2025-08-04 20:27   ` Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2025-08-05 14:21     ` Kefeng Wang
2025-08-05 17:56       ` Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2025-08-05 22:18   ` jane.chu
2025-08-06  0:33     ` jane.chu
2025-08-06  0:56       ` Kefeng Wang
2025-08-06 18:16         ` jane.chu
2025-08-02  7:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm: hugetlb: convert to prep_account_new_hugetlb_folio() Kefeng Wang
2025-08-04 15:54   ` Sidhartha Kumar [this message]
2025-08-04 20:36   ` Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2025-08-05 14:21     ` Kefeng Wang
2025-08-06  0:53     ` jane.chu
2025-08-02  7:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm; hugetlb: simpify alloc_buddy_hugetlb_folio() Kefeng Wang
2025-08-04 15:57   ` Sidhartha Kumar
2025-08-04 20:56   ` Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2025-08-05 14:22     ` Kefeng Wang
2025-08-02  7:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm: hugetlb: directly pass order when allocate a hugetlb folio Kefeng Wang
2025-08-04 16:22   ` Sidhartha Kumar
2025-08-06 20:05   ` jane.chu
2025-08-06 20:17     ` jane.chu
2025-08-02  7:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm: hugetlb: remove struct hstate from init_new_hugetlb_folio() Kefeng Wang
2025-08-04 16:13   ` Sidhartha Kumar
2025-08-06 20:08   ` jane.chu
2025-08-02  7:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm: hugeltb: check NUMA_NO_NODE in only_alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio() Kefeng Wang
2025-08-04 19:09   ` Sidhartha Kumar
2025-08-06 20:43   ` jane.chu
2025-08-12 12:13     ` Kefeng Wang
2025-08-02  7:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm: hugetlb: allocate frozen pages in alloc_gigantic_folio() Kefeng Wang
2025-08-07  1:22   ` jane.chu
2025-08-12 12:11     ` Kefeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=efa76c67-c85e-46e3-9a7b-e4c1cf457aa7@oracle.com \
    --to=sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).