From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/swapfile: avoid confusing swap cache statistics
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 09:53:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f30cb41f-474c-91f2-4912-37387b8b3782@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7d0d606-61ba-9cfc-3c2a-961a88b6c3e5@huawei.com>
On 01.06.22 04:11, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2022/5/31 20:58, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 31.05.22 04:55, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>> On 2022/5/31 7:04, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 27 May 2022 17:26:25 +0800 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> At swapoff time, we're going to swap in the pages continuously. So calling
>>>>> lookup_swap_cache would confuse statistics. We should use find_get_page
>>>>> directly here.
>>>>
>>>> Why is the existing behaviour wrong? swapoff() has to swap stuff in to
>>>> be able to release the swap device. Why do you believe that this
>>>> swapin activity should not be accounted?
>>>
>>> IMHO, statistics, e.g. swap_cache_info.find_success, are used to show the effectiveness
>>> of the swap cache activity. So they should only reflect the memory accessing activity
>>> of the user. I think swapoff can't reflect the effectiveness of the swap cache activity
>>> because it just swaps in pages one by one. Or statistics should reflect all the activity
>>> of the user including swapoff?
>>
>> I'm wondering who cares and why?
>
> I thought it's used to show the effectiveness of the swapcache readahead algorithm. If nobody
> ever cares about it now, I'm fine to drop this patch. And could these statistics be removed
> since nobody cares about it?
IIUC, they are printed (via show_swap_cache_info()), which is called via
show_free_areas() -- primarily used via show_mem(). show_mem() is
primarily used when OOM, when allocation fails and we warn, from the OOM
killer, on panic().
I am not sure how useful for (OOM ?) debugging the find_success vs.
find_total stats are at all. They are from ancient times. In
bb63be0a091c ("tmpfs: move swap_state stats update") we removed other
statistics that are "are relics of my 2.4.11 testing". Maybe
find_success and find_total can be similarly removed.
data_race() indicates to me that these stats are somewhat best-effort
already.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-01 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-27 9:26 [PATCH 0/3] A few fixup patches for swap Miaohe Lin
2022-05-27 9:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/swapfile: make security_vm_enough_memory_mm() work as expected Miaohe Lin
2022-05-30 23:02 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-31 2:40 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-27 9:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/swapfile: avoid confusing swap cache statistics Miaohe Lin
2022-05-30 23:04 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-31 2:55 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-31 12:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-01 2:11 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-06-01 7:53 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2022-06-02 7:29 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-06-02 8:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-06 3:14 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-27 9:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/swapfile: fix possible data races of inuse_pages Miaohe Lin
2022-05-31 13:02 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f30cb41f-474c-91f2-4912-37387b8b3782@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).