From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f70.google.com (mail-pl0-f70.google.com [209.85.160.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADE16B0003 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 20:49:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f70.google.com with SMTP id az5-v6so7878273plb.14 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com. [134.134.136.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u7-v6si4612545plr.293.2018.03.17.17.49.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, pkeys: do not special case protection key 0 References: <20180316214654.895E24EC@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20180316214656.0E059008@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20180317232425.GH1060@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:49:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180317232425.GH1060@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Ram Pai , Dave Hansen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org On 03/17/2018 04:24 PM, Ram Pai wrote: > So the difference between the two proposals is just the freeing part i.e (b). > Did I get this right? Yeah, I think that's the only difference.