From: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
To: Pasha Tatashin <Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
Philip Derrin <philip@cog.systems>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@intel.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
Daniel Vacek <neelx@redhat.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Jia He <jia.he@hxt-semitech.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v10 6/6] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in early_pfn_valid()
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:38:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f69a37b8-3e19-e12b-a51b-2cb62a326bcc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6ed43ee-b09e-1f75-43b3-6cd2808d13f3@microsoft.com>
Hi Pasha
Thanks for the comments
On 8/17/2018 9:35 AM, Pasha Tatashin Wrote:
>
>
> On 7/6/18 5:01 AM, Jia He wrote:
>> Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns
>> where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But there is
>> still some room for improvement. E.g. in early_pfn_valid(), if pfn and
>> pfn+1 are in the same memblock region, we can record the last returned
>> memblock region index and check whether pfn++ is still in the same
>> region.
>>
>> Currently it only improve the performance on arm/arm64 and will have no
>> impact on other arches.
>>
>> For the performance improvement, after this set, I can see the time
>> overhead of memmap_init() is reduced from 27956us to 13537us in my
>> armv8a server(QDF2400 with 96G memory, pagesize 64k).
>
> This series would be a lot simpler if patches 4, 5, and 6 were dropped.
> The extra complexity does not make sense to save 0.0001s/T during not.
>
> Patches 1-3, look OK, but without patches 4-5 __init_memblock should be
> made local static as I suggested earlier.
>
> So, I think Jia should re-spin this series with only 3 patches. Or,
> Andrew could remove the from linux-next before merge.
>
I will respin it with #1-#3 patch if no more comments
Cheers,
Jia
> Thank you,
> Pavel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-17 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-06 9:01 [RESEND PATCH v10 0/6] optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn and early_pfn_valid on arm and arm64 Jia He
2018-07-06 9:01 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 1/6] arm: arm64: introduce CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID Jia He
2018-08-17 14:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-08-20 6:27 ` Jia He
2018-07-06 9:01 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 2/6] mm: page_alloc: remain memblock_next_valid_pfn() on arm/arm64 Jia He
2018-07-06 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-09 3:30 ` Jia He
2018-08-16 22:54 ` Pasha Tatashin
2018-07-06 9:01 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 3/6] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn() Jia He
2018-08-17 1:08 ` Pasha Tatashin
2018-08-17 1:22 ` Pasha Tatashin
2018-08-21 6:14 ` Jia He
2018-08-21 21:08 ` Andrew Morton
2018-08-22 1:38 ` Jia He
2018-07-06 9:01 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 4/6] mm/memblock: introduce memblock_search_pfn_regions() Jia He
2018-07-06 9:01 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 5/6] mm/memblock: introduce pfn_valid_region() Jia He
2018-07-06 9:01 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 6/6] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in early_pfn_valid() Jia He
2018-08-17 1:35 ` Pasha Tatashin
2018-08-17 1:38 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-08-17 5:38 ` Jia He [this message]
2018-07-06 22:41 ` [RESEND PATCH v10 0/6] optimize memblock_next_valid_pfn and early_pfn_valid on arm and arm64 Andrew Morton
2018-08-15 22:34 ` Andrew Morton
2018-08-16 19:02 ` Pasha Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f69a37b8-3e19-e12b-a51b-2cb62a326bcc@gmail.com \
--to=hejianet@gmail.com \
--cc=Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=erosca@de.adit-jv.com \
--cc=gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jia.he@hxt-semitech.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kemi.wang@intel.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=neelx@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=philip@cog.systems \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).