From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06EEC433EF for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 804238D000E; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 03:39:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 78C038D0006; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 03:39:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 605918D000E; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 03:39:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.26]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0D28D0006 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 03:39:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268DE623B8 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:39:15 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79394600670.22.FFB8965 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DE24003B for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:39:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1650872354; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JYIpSctnaXqJRrJZY7KOLeHqatclb2EJy7kwxJNXcEA=; b=IyKM/hBr8A6e6AZR8Hkrfb/MtPj8v4zdrULVxMFwzp9SDCSmQS0aO0kUnpOgHXyybY4dTV wdXc1E9ATUSHWmsa4t1PbQkpOgALe/Uw02ZWBnSn5uF33Lm6A2J1Rqyec1vzPHL5i6IhEu XEsG1TsV25LlNx+WaW94YfPxleiqiQQ= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-116-AqwhBfvpP0uo4srp8cKmyA-1; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 03:39:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: AqwhBfvpP0uo4srp8cKmyA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 186-20020a1c02c3000000b003928cd3853aso5436459wmc.9 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:39:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JYIpSctnaXqJRrJZY7KOLeHqatclb2EJy7kwxJNXcEA=; b=qHdlgYaMMuNsub82vkP5dfTWHx2q9Ox8uyvD9I0nSqisakh8eiA93+FIKUOIDlZmS/ 9YEO0GBJr1Pkvqm6d+iFiMv1qSjmPdC2DcVyc1LTTFW/qab54X6wLKM98En70gpt24cC kBdLBExLjP82fUKJmH8rYV73+0ob1CDVX1U45dXy9ty2zaow0yMEEr2VVT1qN6v8wz/J qKhX7Df5rttFnepG5gmzAqd4XAJHLa5bi5xTnCKFy2MgBvmFslbnLVL/7hjlVydNam28 a4KiwrwKrl/umrw/O62jFkdg1NsuR/7byn9vaAKvv/hgLZzLQh8HNmkM2YgFFElvRYty wPYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53200tJFnVbgRnsmuXheBifwcjH+KiClJfhCsKRPnwUZJC7FnBbb P0Kgg+lPMOch8r081s5UzpeYYQQJel5oSX0F3iu6zv9BeKGZ+k/kvPZsuPVSRUkgzUKbk9AXLAU jWkLpB5s1QCA= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6843:0:b0:20a:def2:5545 with SMTP id o3-20020a5d6843000000b0020adef25545mr1252122wrw.89.1650872351776; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:39:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyj70WP2fyKeHfPoCu95Q+61xddwrribEw7PcH9kHB3qmPDdktTVAhutfLF8c9SCnQEime/Sg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6843:0:b0:20a:def2:5545 with SMTP id o3-20020a5d6843000000b0020adef25545mr1252092wrw.89.1650872351517; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c700:fc00:490d:ed6a:8b22:223a? (p200300cbc700fc00490ded6a8b22223a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c700:fc00:490d:ed6a:8b22:223a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y9-20020a05600015c900b0020adb0e106asm2756818wry.93.2022.04.25.00.39.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:39:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/swapfile: Fix lost swap bits in unuse_pte() To: Miaohe Lin , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: willy@infradead.org, vbabka@suse.cz, dhowells@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, apopple@nvidia.com, surenb@google.com, minchan@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220424091105.48374-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com> <20220424091105.48374-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20220424091105.48374-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 35DE24003B X-Stat-Signature: 4hip1fzf6sthiu7hfkbus3hbxjfdmktx Authentication-Results: imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="IyKM/hBr"; spf=none (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.133.124) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com X-HE-Tag: 1650872353-909364 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 24.04.22 11:11, Miaohe Lin wrote: > This is observed by code review only but not any real report. > > When we turn off swapping we could have lost the bits stored in the swap > ptes. The new rmap-exclusive bit is fine since that turned into a page > flag, but not for soft-dirty and uffd-wp. Add them. > > Suggested-by: Peter Xu > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin > --- > mm/swapfile.c | 10 +++++++--- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c > index 95b63f69f388..522a0eb16bf1 100644 > --- a/mm/swapfile.c > +++ b/mm/swapfile.c > @@ -1783,7 +1783,7 @@ static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, > { > struct page *swapcache; > spinlock_t *ptl; > - pte_t *pte; > + pte_t *pte, new_pte; > int ret = 1; > > swapcache = page; > @@ -1832,8 +1832,12 @@ static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, > page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, addr); > lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable(page, vma); > } > - set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte, > - pte_mkold(mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot))); > + new_pte = pte_mkold(mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot)); > + if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(*pte)) > + new_pte = pte_mksoft_dirty(new_pte); > + if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(*pte)) > + new_pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(new_pte); > + set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte, new_pte); > swap_free(entry); > out: > pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl); Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand -- Thanks, David / dhildenb