From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Yuan Liu <yuan1.liu@intel.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Nanhai Zou <nanhai.zou@intel.com>,
Pan Deng <pan.deng@intel.com>, Tianyou Li <tianyou.li@intel.com>,
Chen Zhang <zhangchen.kidd@jd.com>,
Jason Zeng <jason.zeng@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] mm/memory_hotplug: improve shrink_zone_span() subsection boundary checks
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 13:02:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff4fe959-c0e2-46f0-91d6-0839c90d62e8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723084946.189392-3-yuan1.liu@intel.com>
On 7/23/26 10:49, Yuan Liu wrote:
> When shrinking a zone span after removing a PFN range,
> find_smallest_section_pfn() and find_biggest_section_pfn()
> only checked one edge PFN in each subsection for nid/zone matching.
>
> If a memory or hole boundary falls in the middle of a subsection,
> that edge PFN may belong to a different nid/zone, causing the helpers
> to miss a valid PFN within that subsection.
>
> Fix this by checking both subsection edge PFNs for nid/zone matching.
> Keep a single pfn_to_online_page() check per subsection, since online
> state is the same for all PFNs in a subsection.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Zeng <jason.zeng@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Liu <yuan1.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 4c699fd9c479..3a281d595207 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -427,17 +427,24 @@ static unsigned long find_smallest_section_pfn(int nid, struct zone *zone,
> unsigned long start_pfn,
> unsigned long end_pfn)
> {
> - for (; start_pfn < end_pfn; start_pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
> - if (unlikely(!pfn_to_online_page(start_pfn)))
> - continue;
> + unsigned long next_pfn;
>
> - if (unlikely(pfn_to_nid(start_pfn) != nid))
> - continue;
> + for (; start_pfn < end_pfn; start_pfn = next_pfn) {
> + unsigned long tail_pfn;
>
> - if (zone != page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn)))
> + next_pfn = start_pfn + PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION;
> + tail_pfn = next_pfn - 1;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!pfn_to_online_page(start_pfn)))
> continue;
>
> - return start_pfn;
> + if (likely(pfn_to_nid(start_pfn) == nid) &&
> + zone == page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn)))
> + return start_pfn;
> +
> + if (likely(pfn_to_nid(tail_pfn) == nid) &&
> + zone == page_zone(pfn_to_page(tail_pfn)))
> + return start_pfn;
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -448,21 +455,26 @@ static unsigned long find_biggest_section_pfn(int nid, struct zone *zone,
> unsigned long start_pfn,
> unsigned long end_pfn)
> {
> - unsigned long pfn;
> + unsigned long pfn, prev_pfn;
>
> /* pfn is the end pfn of a memory section. */
> pfn = end_pfn - 1;
> - for (; pfn >= start_pfn; pfn -= PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
> - if (unlikely(!pfn_to_online_page(pfn)))
> - continue;
> + for (; pfn >= start_pfn; pfn = prev_pfn) {
> + unsigned long head_pfn;
>
> - if (unlikely(pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid))
> - continue;
> + prev_pfn = pfn - PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION;
> + head_pfn = prev_pfn + 1;
>
> - if (zone != page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)))
> + if (unlikely(!pfn_to_online_page(pfn)))
> continue;
>
> - return pfn;
> + if (likely(pfn_to_nid(pfn) == nid) &&
> + zone == page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)))
> + return pfn;
> +
> + if (likely(pfn_to_nid(head_pfn) == nid) &&
> + zone == page_zone(pfn_to_page(head_pfn)))
> + return pfn;
> }
>
> return 0;
I think improving that should be patch #1.
But I think we can do much better code-wise. What about the following
cleanup instead:
From 6e9ea094daf8d04c0b119b780572a846334f8164 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 12:52:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug: make shrink_zone_span() more robust
Let's make shrink_zone_span() more robust by checking in
find_smallest_section_pfn() / find_biggest_section_pfn() that start+end
of the subsection.
While at it, clean up the function heavily, factoring the core check
out into subsection_overlaps_zone().
There likely is no need to check for the nid first: we require
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE where pfn_to_page() is cheap, and the
pfn_to_nid() on CONFIG_NUMA would do a pfn_to_page() either way. So
let's just drop that for now.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
---
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 226ab9cb078ad..79937f9672d01 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -425,49 +425,39 @@ int __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
return err;
}
-/* find the smallest valid pfn in the range [start_pfn, end_pfn) */
-static unsigned long find_smallest_section_pfn(int nid, struct zone *zone,
- unsigned long start_pfn,
- unsigned long end_pfn)
+static bool subsection_overlaps_zone(unsigned long pfn, struct zone *zone)
{
- for (; start_pfn < end_pfn; start_pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
- if (unlikely(!pfn_to_online_page(start_pfn)))
- continue;
+ const unsigned long start_pfn = ALIGN_DOWN(pfn, PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION);
+ const unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION - 1;
- if (unlikely(pfn_to_nid(start_pfn) != nid))
- continue;
+ /* All pages in a subsection are either online or offline. */
+ if (unlikely(!pfn_to_online_page(start_pfn)))
+ return false;
- if (zone != page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn)))
- continue;
+ /* Checking start+end is sufficient. */
+ return zone == page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn)) ||
+ zone == page_zone(pfn_to_page(end_pfn));
+}
- return start_pfn;
+/* find the smallest valid pfn in the range [start_pfn, end_pfn) */
+static unsigned long find_smallest_section_pfn(struct zone *zone,
+ unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
+{
+ for (; start_pfn < end_pfn; start_pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
+ if (subsection_overlaps_zone(start_pfn, zone))
+ return start_pfn;
}
-
return 0;
}
/* find the biggest valid pfn in the range [start_pfn, end_pfn). */
-static unsigned long find_biggest_section_pfn(int nid, struct zone *zone,
- unsigned long start_pfn,
- unsigned long end_pfn)
+static unsigned long find_biggest_section_pfn(struct zone *zone,
+ unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
{
- unsigned long pfn;
-
- /* pfn is the end pfn of a memory section. */
- pfn = end_pfn - 1;
- for (; pfn >= start_pfn; pfn -= PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
- if (unlikely(!pfn_to_online_page(pfn)))
- continue;
-
- if (unlikely(pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid))
- continue;
-
- if (zone != page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)))
- continue;
-
- return pfn;
+ for (; end_pfn >= start_pfn; end_pfn -= PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) {
+ if (subsection_overlaps_zone(end_pfn - 1, zone))
+ return end_pfn - 1;
}
-
return 0;
}
@@ -475,7 +465,6 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
unsigned long end_pfn)
{
unsigned long pfn;
- int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
if (zone->zone_start_pfn == start_pfn) {
/*
@@ -484,7 +473,7 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
* In this case, we find second smallest valid mem_section
* for shrinking zone.
*/
- pfn = find_smallest_section_pfn(nid, zone, end_pfn,
+ pfn = find_smallest_section_pfn(zone, end_pfn,
zone_end_pfn(zone));
if (pfn) {
zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn(zone) - pfn;
@@ -500,7 +489,7 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
* In this case, we find second biggest valid mem_section for
* shrinking zone.
*/
- pfn = find_biggest_section_pfn(nid, zone, zone->zone_start_pfn,
+ pfn = find_biggest_section_pfn(zone, zone->zone_start_pfn,
start_pfn);
if (pfn)
zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone->zone_start_pfn + 1;
--
2.43.0
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 8:49 [PATCH v6 0/2] mm/memory_hotplug: optimize zone contiguous check when changing pfn range Yuan Liu
2026-07-23 8:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] " Yuan Liu
2026-08-05 11:53 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-06 7:23 ` Liu, Yuan1
2026-08-06 8:45 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-06 9:52 ` Liu, Yuan1
2026-07-23 8:49 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] mm/memory_hotplug: improve shrink_zone_span() subsection boundary checks Yuan Liu
2026-07-25 2:49 ` Wei Yang
2026-07-27 9:49 ` Liu, Yuan1
2026-07-30 2:36 ` Wei Yang
2026-07-30 7:57 ` Liu, Yuan1
2026-08-01 0:59 ` Wei Yang
2026-08-05 11:02 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-08-06 7:14 ` Liu, Yuan1
2026-08-05 9:40 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] mm/memory_hotplug: optimize zone contiguous check when changing pfn range Liu, Yuan1
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff4fe959-c0e2-46f0-91d6-0839c90d62e8@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jason.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nanhai.zou@intel.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pan.deng@intel.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tianyou.li@intel.com \
--cc=yuan1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhangchen.kidd@jd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox