Hi Michal, On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 05:12:00PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > For the dead code, I can remove the fixes tags, and even the changes > > themselves, since there are good reasons to keep the dead code > > (consistency, and avoiding a future programmer forgetting to add it back > > when adding a subsequent seprintf() call). > > > > For the fixes to UB, do you prefer the Fixes tags to be removed too? > > Are any of those UB a real or just theoretical problems? To be more > precise I do not question to have those plugged but is there any > evidence that older kernels would need those as well other than just in > case? No, I haven't done any checks to verify that this is exploitable in any way. I personally wouldn't backport any of this. About the Fixes: tags, I guess if they are interpreted as something to be backported, I'll remove them all, as I don't want to backport this. I guess having them listed in the mailing list archives would be good enough for speleology purposes (e.g., for someone interested in what kinds of issues this API fixes). I'll remove them all. Cheers, Alex > > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs --