From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] change alloc function in pcpu_alloc_pages
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:00:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <h2w28c262361004150100ne936d943u28f76c0f171d3db8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BC6BE78.1030503@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 04/15/2010 10:31 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Hi, Tejun.
>>> This being a pretty cold path, I don't really see much benefit in
>>> converting it to alloc_pages_node_exact(). It ain't gonna make any
>>> difference. I'd rather stay with the safer / boring one unless
>>> there's a pressing reason to convert.
>>
>> Actually, It's to weed out not-good API usage as well as some
>> performance gain. But I don't think to need it strongly.
>> Okay. Please keep in mind about this and correct it if you confirms
>> it in future. :)
>
> Hmm... if most users are converting over to alloc_pages_node_exact(),
> I think it would be better to convert percpu too. I thought it was a
> performance optimization (of rather silly kind too). So, this is to
> weed out -1 node id usage? Wouldn't it be better to update
> alloc_pages_node() such that it whines once per each caller if it's
> called with -1 node id and after updating most users convert the
> warning into WARN_ON_ONCE()? Having two variants for this seems
> rather extreme to me.
Yes. I don't like it.
With it, someone who does care about API usage uses alloc_pages_exact_node but
someone who don't have a time or careless uses alloc_pages_node.
It would make API fragmentation and not good.
Maybe we can weed out -1 and make new API which is more clear.
* struct page *alloc_pages_any_node(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order);
* struct page *alloc_pages_exact_node(int nid, gfp_mask, unsigned int order);
So firstly we have to make sure users who use alloc_pages_node can
change alloc_pages_node with alloc_pages_exact_node.
After all of it was weed out, I will change alloc_pages_node with
alloc_pages_any_node.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-15 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-13 15:24 [PATCH 1/6] Remove node's validity check in alloc_pages Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] change alloc function in pcpu_alloc_pages Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:48 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-14 23:39 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15 1:31 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15 7:21 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15 8:00 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-04-15 8:15 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15 9:40 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15 10:08 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15 10:21 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15 10:33 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15 11:43 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15 11:49 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-16 16:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-16 19:13 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-04-18 15:55 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-18 15:54 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-18 21:22 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-19 0:03 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-19 17:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-20 0:20 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-19 17:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-19 22:27 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-20 15:05 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-21 10:48 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-22 10:15 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-21 14:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-21 17:06 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] change alloc function in alloc_slab_page Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:52 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 16:01 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 16:14 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 21:37 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-13 23:40 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 23:55 ` David Rientjes
2010-04-14 0:02 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-14 0:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-14 12:23 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-16 16:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-18 18:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-19 9:05 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 15:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] change alloc function in vmemmap_alloc_block Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:59 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-14 0:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-13 15:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] change alloc function in __vmalloc_area_node Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 16:02 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-14 0:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-14 0:33 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] Add comment in alloc_pages_exact_node Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 16:13 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 16:20 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] Remove node's validity check in alloc_pages Mel Gorman
2010-04-14 0:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=h2w28c262361004150100ne936d943u28f76c0f171d3db8@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lliubbo@gmail.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).