linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@163.com>,
	 willy@infradead.org, josef@toxicpanda.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] readahead: fix return value of page_cache_next_miss() when no hole is found
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 12:54:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <i2zcz37av7oon464vj4jqvmyz53j46kpd6427xmpamukcqekro@hg566sdiruba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250605145152.9ae3edb99f29ef46b30096e4@linux-foundation.org>

On Thu 05-06-25 14:51:52, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 10:22:23 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu 05-06-25 13:49:35, Chi Zhiling wrote:
> > > From: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
> > > 
> > > max_scan in page_cache_next_miss always decreases to zero when no hole
> > > is found, causing the return value to be index + 0.
> > > 
> > > Fix this by preserving the max_scan value throughout the loop.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 901a269ff3d5 ("filemap: fix page_cache_next_miss() when no hole found")
> > > Signed-off-by: Chi Zhiling <chizhiling@kylinos.cn>
> > 
> > Indeed. Thanks for catching this. Don't know how I missed that. Feel free
> > to add:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > 
> 
> Thanks.  It's a simple patch - do we expect it to have significant
> runtime effects?

I'm not sure if Chi Zhiling observed some practical effects. From what I
know and have seen in the past, wrong responses from page_cache_next_miss()
can lead to readahead window reduction and thus reduced read speeds.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-06 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-05  5:49 [PATCH] readahead: fix return value of page_cache_next_miss() when no hole is found Chi Zhiling
2025-06-05  8:22 ` Jan Kara
2025-06-05 21:51   ` Andrew Morton
2025-06-06 10:54     ` Jan Kara [this message]
2025-06-08  3:00       ` Chi Zhiling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=i2zcz37av7oon464vj4jqvmyz53j46kpd6427xmpamukcqekro@hg566sdiruba \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chizhiling@163.com \
    --cc=chizhiling@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).