From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15C4D8D003B for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:15:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QSX1d-0004nN-Po for linux-mm@kvack.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:15:05 +0200 Received: from smtp.mgpi.de ([212.202.249.42]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:15:05 +0200 Received: from bheld by smtp.mgpi.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:15:05 +0200 From: Bernhard Held Subject: Re: KVM induced panic on 2.6.38[2367] & 2.6.39 Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:50:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20110601011527.GN19505@random.random> <4DE5DCA8.7070704@fnarfbargle.com> <4DE5E29E.7080009@redhat.com> <4DE60669.9050606@fnarfbargle.com> <4DE60918.3010008@redhat.com> <4DE60940.1070107@redhat.com> <4DE61A2B.7000008@fnarfbargle.com> <20110601111841.GB3956@zip.com.au> <4DE62801.9080804@fnarfbargle.com> <20110601230342.GC3956@zip.com.au> <4DE8E3ED.7080004@fnarfbargle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <4DE8E3ED.7080004@fnarfbargle.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Am 03.06.2011 15:38, schrieb Brad Campbell: > On 02/06/11 07:03, CaT wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:52:33PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote: >>> Unfortunately the only interface that is mentioned by name anywhere >>> in my firewall is $DMZ (which is ppp0 and not part of any bridge). >>> >>> All of the nat/dnat and other horrible hacks are based on IP addresses. >> >> Damn. Not referencing the bridge interfaces at all stopped our host from >> going down in flames when we passed it a few packets. These are two >> of the oopses we got from it. Whilst the kernel here is .35 we got the >> same issue from a range of kernels. Seems related. > > Well, I tried sending an explanatory message to netdev, netfilter & cc'd to kvm, > but it appears not to have made it to kvm or netfilter, and the cc to netdev has > not elicited a response. My resend to netfilter seems to have dropped into the > bit bucket also. Just another reference 3.5 months ago: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg17239.html Bernhard -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org